|
Lexington Home Page
|
Help
|
About
|
Browse
Search
2005-03-28-AC-min
Breadcrumb Navigation:
TownOfLexington-Public
>
WEB PUBLISHED-PUBLIC DOCUMENTS
>
MINUTES-REPORTS-COMMITTEES ARCHIVE
>
Appropriation Committee-AC
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
2005-03-28-AC-min
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/2/2022 3:25:58 PM
Creation date
3/9/2009 4:00:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Archives
Year
2005
Department
Town Clerk
Keywords or Subject
Minutes - AC - Appropriation Committee
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
Page 1 of 1
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> March 28, 2005 <br />Minutes <br />Town of Lexington Appropriation Committee <br />March 28, 2005 <br /> <br /> <br />Place and time: Reading Room, Cary Hall; meeting called to order at 6:15 pm <br /> <br />Members present: Alan Levine (Chair), Eric Michelson, Deborah Brown, Ron <br />Pawliczek, Richard Eurich, Paul Hamburger, Rod Cole <br /> <br />1. RC agreed to be minute taker. <br />2. It was decided to pass out the AC report to precinct captains rather than put them <br />out on the TMMA table to be sure one copy was reserved for each TM member. <br />3. The committee decided not to take a position on Article 21. <br />4. There was a long discussion of the Community Preservation Act. <br />a. AL expressed concern that the CPA is not ready for prime time. <br />b. DB commented that one possibility is to let it go forward now with the <br />advice that the proponents need to bring forward more information. <br />c. There was a discussion of how the timing works and related problems, and <br />how CPA might pass, but crowd out other pressing overrides. <br />d. We decided to continue the discussion at our next meeting. <br />5. There was a discussion regarding the article to upgrade the heating systems at <br />Clarke and Diamond, and the various options, costs vs. savings, and whether these <br />upgrades might be replaced in the near term by other upgrades, say to gas heat. <br />We decided to continue this discussion when we had more information. <br />6. There was a discussion of capital items. <br />a. Is the CEC cap on borrowing reasonable? Opinions were heard on both <br />sides. <br />b. The $25K for a street light at Concord Ave was discussed. The sense was <br />that this was not a high priority and that the Avalon Bay traffic mitigation <br />money could perhaps pay for it when needed in two years. <br />7. Moved, seconded, and voted unanimously to adjourn. <br /> <br /> <br />Respectfully submitted, <br /> <br />Rod Cole <br /> <br /> <br />Approved June 22, 2005 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.