Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> March 3, 2005 <br />Minutes <br />Town of Lexington Appropriation Committee <br />March 3, 2005 <br /> <br /> <br />Members present: J. Bartenstein, D. Brown (Vice Chair), R. Cole, R. Eurich, P. <br />Hamburger, D. Kanter, A. Levine (Chair), R. Pawliczek <br /> <br />Time and place: The meeting was called to order at 7:40 by Al Levine in Town <br />PM <br />Office Building Room 111. <br /> <br />Material Distributed: <br />?? <br />Agenda <br />?? <br />Community Preservation Coalition document dated November 2002 <br />?? <br />Draft #5 of the Appropriation Committee Report by David Kanter <br /> <br />Minutes <br />1. : Paul Hamburger agreed to take the minutes of this meeting. <br /> <br />Discussion of Community Preservation Act (CPA) <br />2. : Bob Bicknell, representing the <br />Lexington Housing partnership, addressed the meeting. He focused on the advantages of <br />CPA for affordable housing development. He discussed a Stow plan under CPA which <br />pays homeowners a fixed fee for a home to remain affordable even after the homeowner <br />leaves the property. Also, a Franklin School proposal was mentioned. Eric Michelson <br />pointed out that Marshall Derby has said that LEXHAB has enough money to deal with <br />the Franklin project should CPA not be enacted. <br /> <br />The motion from the Board of Selectmen is expected to be for 3%, to start in FY 07, and <br />to use 2 exemptions, namely: (1) low and moderate income exemption, and (2) $100,000 <br />reduction in property valuation. The commercial/industrial exemption was not selected <br />by the Board of Selectmen. <br /> <br />The committee asked that Bob co-ordinate with the other interest group players to supply <br />a history of projects that would have applied were the CPA in effect then and a list of <br />future projects that would apply. Each of these lists should have at least a rough dollar <br />value associated with them. <br /> <br />Proposed Tree Planting Expenditure <br />3. : John Frey, Chair of the Tree Committee <br />addressed the meeting. He explained the three articles in the warrant relating to trees. <br />He did not have an answer to where the proposed $15,000 requested would come from. <br />John allowed that he had had the opportunity to ask for this money before the warrant <br />closed. It was suggested that there is $5,000 in the budget for tree planting. It was <br />pointed out that the Selectmen, aware of the request, had evidently prioritized the tree <br />planting below other requests, and that is why it is not in the budget. John pointed out <br />that the Town had lost over 200 trees in the past two years in excess of those few planted. <br />This $15,000 request would only pay for 30 trees. It would be a token, and not keep up <br />with the public tree loss being experienced by the town. <br /> 1 <br /> <br />