Laserfiche WebLink
December 9, 2004 <br /> <br /> Overlay Account <br />4.. There was a brief discussion of the status of past overlay <br />accounts, and whether they might prove to be a source of additional reserves. SE <br />indicated that this was not likely to be a significant source of funds. Due to care taken in <br />the assessment process and a favorable history of abatements, the amounts placed in <br />Lexington’s overlay have been relatively small in recent years, compared with other <br />towns. There is now some indication that abatement requests may be trending upward. <br />Since the assessor may release funds from a prior year’s overlay account as surplus only <br />when there is a cumulative surplus in all the outstanding overlay accounts, it is not likely <br />that there will be significant funds to release. <br /> <br /> Approval of Minutes <br />5.. With minor amendments, minutes were approved for <br />the meetings held on: 4/22/04, 8/19/04 and 11/17/04. AL will send a final version of the <br />minutes to the Town Clerk, with a copy to David Kaufman for posting on the TMMA <br />web site. <br /> <br />. Campaign Participation Policy. <br />6EM circulated a draft policy on participation <br />in local political campaigns designed to accommodate concerns that had been expressed <br />in the prior meeting. After extensive discussion, the Committee voted 6:1 to adopt the <br />policy statement as drafted by EM. RE initially opposed the motion on the ground that <br />he would have preferred a more stringent policy, but indicated that he would be willing to <br />vote to adopt the policy by acclaim. A revote was then taken, and the policy was adopted <br />by acclaim. <br /> <br /> Override Referendum Timing <br />7.. AL summarized the email he had circulated <br />on 12/8/04 addressing “high level fiscal policies,” in particular the development and <br />maintenance of reserves and the timing of overrides, and asked for comments. There <br />ensued an extended discussion of: (a) the relative advantages and disadvantages of having <br />override referenda every year, every two years or every three years; (b) whether overrides <br />should be planned on a fixed schedule or dictated by financial needs as they arise; (c) the <br />need to engage in longer-term financial planning; and (d) the need to include in fiscal <br />planning the development and maintenance of adequate reserves. <br /> <br />2020 Budget Task Force Request <br />8. . There was a brief discussion of the <br />request from the Lexington 2020 Budget Task Force for input on a proposed series of <br />forums with financial directors from other towns to exchange information about <br />budgetary and financial challenges and responses. The consensus was that this might be <br />a valuable exercise in the long run, but that there would not be sufficient time to give it <br />serious attention until after the conclusion of this year’s Annual Town Meeting. SE <br />pointed out that the 2020 committee had gathered some useful information from other <br />communities. In particular, the Town of Brookline has recently published a set of fiscal <br />policies dealing with reserves, etc., and also has published a very informative set of <br />“trend reports” comparing its financial performance with that of other Aaa-rated <br />communities. JB added that these materials are available on the Town of Brookline web <br />site and promised to circulate a link. <br /> <br /> <br />