|
Lexington Home Page
|
Help
|
About
|
Browse
Search
2006-12-11-CEC-min
Breadcrumb Navigation:
TownOfLexington-Public
>
WEB PUBLISHED-PUBLIC DOCUMENTS
>
MINUTES-REPORTS-COMMITTEES ARCHIVE
>
Capital Expenditures Committee-CEC
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2006
>
2006-12-11-CEC-min
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/18/2019 12:35:01 PM
Creation date
3/5/2009 1:37:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Archives
Department
Town Clerk
Keywords or Subject
CEC - Capital Expenditures Committee
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />CEC 12/11/06, TOB 111, 7:30am <br /> <br />TE, CWL, RB, SS, BH <br /> <br />DK, Steve Frederickson, Karen Mullins, Rob Addelson, Derek FUllerton <br /> <br />Community Development Department <br /> <br />Permit Tracking Software $250K. Workflow, Field Connectivity, support <br />line. Department handls 1200 building permits per year, $1.7M in bldg <br />permit revenue per year. More than 3000 permits in the entire <br />department. Recreation would not fall under this software. <br /> <br />Presently, the departments each have their own db's (e.g. Access) w/ <br />no interplay or coordination. <br /> <br />This would allow remote access (e.g. online application, in-field <br />access (via a Palm Pilot). <br /> <br />They'd use existing hardware and they assume that the hardware <br />required is cheap. <br /> <br />Committee raises issues with software capitalization. <br /> <br />Benefit: check status of permits, schedule status, information <br />sharing, unified permit process for multi-permit jobs. <br /> <br />SS: Would be nice to have coordination w/ Historic Commission <br />registry. <br /> <br />This might be a 3 year project. <br /> <br />RB: Leasing the software might be more interesting. <br /> <br />BH: will people realize the value if we do this as a fee increase? <br />What's the plan for the MIS Director replacement? <br /> <br />RB: Software would have to be running before a fee increase could be <br />legitimately imposed. <br /> <br />Questions for Rob: <br /> <br />Would it be a single license or multiple licenses for each department? <br /> <br />What is the plan to fill the MIS Director position? <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.