|
Lexington Home Page
|
Help
|
About
|
Browse
Search
2006-11-15-CEC-min
Breadcrumb Navigation:
TownOfLexington-Public
>
WEB PUBLISHED-PUBLIC DOCUMENTS
>
MINUTES-REPORTS-COMMITTEES ARCHIVE
>
Capital Expenditures Committee-CEC
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2006
>
2006-11-15-CEC-min
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/18/2019 12:35:01 PM
Creation date
3/5/2009 1:35:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Archives
Department
Town Clerk
Keywords or Subject
CEC - Capital Expenditures Committee
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />CEC 11/15/06 10:00am, TOB 111 <br /> <br />CWL, TE, SS, TB, BH <br />Kanter, Rob ADelson, Jeanne Krieger, Bill Kennedy <br /> <br />Discussion of DPW facility, timeline, open issues. <br /> <br />JK: The current $ estimate is from HKT, and an estimate from a <br />professional estimator is happening presently. The PBC will review <br />this on Monday. She feels the estimate will be good enough to go to <br />STM with. Pragmatically she wants the referendum in March. BoS has <br />not yet taken a position on whether to continue spending more D/D <br />money between STM and March (assuming it passes STM). BoS has asked <br />Bill Kennedy to figure out how much money should be spent between STM <br />and March, but don't know that amount yet. Believes > $1.2M. DK <br />believes $2.0 to $2.4M to get to construction docs. <br /> <br />RB: Doubts that the current figure is +/- 5%. For example, don't know <br />the energy details yet because there are no mechanicals available. <br />Believes operating costs will be significantly higher than current <br />building. <br /> <br />TE: There's no transition plan. How much will it cost to have DPW <br />relocated? Concerned about keeping sand/salt facility open during <br />construction. 1.2M$ + 720K$ is about $2M, but that's < one-third of <br />the soft $'s so how can they come up with a +/- 5% number with only <br />that amount spent? <br /> <br />BH: Believes $30M will go down on the first try. There are two <br />approaches: (1) Set a max $ figure and stick to it, or (2) don't worry <br />about what the cost will be. <br /> <br />RB: A big hurdle is still the heated garage space. <br /> <br />JK: If we wait for construction docs, it will be June before we have a <br />referendum. <br /> <br />TE: Takes issue w/ June. Could have construction docs by ATM. <br /> <br />JK: But doesn't want a referendum in June since there may be an <br />operating override then. <br /> <br />BK: HKT says they can't get construction docs done by June -- believes <br />they need 5 months to get there. <br /> <br />DK: If current status of docs is Design Development, the next phase is <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.