Laserfiche WebLink
Breadcrumb Navigation:
<br />From: Charles Lamb <br />Sent: Thursday, March 30, 2006 9:40 AM <br />To: Donna Hooper; David L. Kaufman <br />Subject: CEC 2-27-06 minutes <br /> <br />CEC 2-27-06 TOB 111, noon <br /> <br />RB, CWL, TE, BH, Kanter (Liason) <br /> <br />Approve Minutes 2/13, 2/17 (4:0) <br /> <br />Outdoor Sound System: No operating expenses, no questions at the <br />moment. Likely to not be > $25K so not capital. <br /> <br />ADA TOB Ramp: <br /> <br />TE: Not addressed by BFAC. <br /> <br />RB: Is it necessary? Keep it pending w/ request to Dis. Comm. for <br />priorities. <br /> <br />BH: Delay it a year. <br /> <br />RB: Agrees. <br /> <br />Consensus, let it go until next year. <br /> <br />White House: Placeholder is for a STM. <br /> <br />Sr. Ctr. Design Study: <br /> <br />BH: OK deferring it <br /> <br />Cash Capital Policy <br /> <br />CWL: How hard do we want to advocate for CCP? <br /> <br />RB: $2M is confusing enough to TMM's. Putting caveats on it at this <br />point clouds the issue. But continue to bang shoe on the table. <br />Consider an amendment later. <br /> <br />BH: Charge is to be aware of and advocate for capital. <br /> <br />TE: Pick your fights. Assess the benefits. NO benefits to having an <br />amendment. When we comment on the motion, indicate that we prefer <br />earmarking, but should continue to bang shoe on the table. <br /> <br />