Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Minutes of 2/17/06 CEC meeting <br /> <br />CEC called to order at 8:35AM with BH, SS,RB and TE present. Joint <br />meeting with Board of Selectmen, School Committee and Appropriations <br />Committee. <br /> <br />First item discussed was the CEC status report distributed by Michael <br />Young. Questions from other attendees were answered as indicated. <br /> <br />RP (BOS) Why the delay in the Fire Station improvements. Chief <br />M. indicated why it was not desirable to construct ladies room. RB <br />indicated we were still looking for info on other parts, i.e., <br />drainage and and roof repairs <br /> <br />JK(BOS) Why only $250K, and not $300K, for sidewalks? TE said we <br />started with $150K and added $100K after reviewing other <br />projects. Also, we are going from $50K (FY05) to $100K (FY06) to <br />$250K. She appeared satisfied. <br /> <br />TG (SC) Asked about our position on $40K for strategic capital plan, <br />TE said we thought it could be done in house or with operating <br />funds. PA (Dr Ashe) indicated he thought it would be an extension of <br />previous work done with capital funding. <br /> <br />TG wanted to know why there was $0 by the White House project. TE <br />indicated it was because CEC understood that SC wanted to go to voters <br />at same time as DPW facility. When asked, TG indicated he did not know <br />what figure he wanted inserted. CEC agreed to put in whatever figure <br />SC wanted in request column. <br /> <br />RP asked about Electric Utility study. Answer was we were waiting to <br />be sure voters wanted to have a muni light plant and did not want to <br />put up limited capital for a maybe project. <br /> <br />PK(BOS) wanted to know why lockers were only supported for one <br />school. Answer: matter of priorites and Bridge was most crowded. <br /> <br />RP asked about Visitor Center project. Answer: Matter of priorities - <br />deferred to following year. <br /> <br />PK asked about HS work and particularly the Univents. RB explained how <br />the project was more than Univents. <br /> <br />JK asked CV(Town Manager) if he was happy with CEC projected Cash <br />Capital program for the municipal side. CV indicated he was satisfied <br />with CEC recommendations. <br /> <br />