Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Town of Lexington <br />Capital Expenditures Committee <br /> <br />Draft <br /> Summit III Meeting Notes <br /> <br />January 9, 2003 <br />Hastings School Gymnasium <br /> <br /> <br />Note: These summary minutes cover ONLY the sections of the <br />discussion pertinent to capital and Capital Expenditure <br />Committee matters, not the full meeting (which was also <br />attended by the Selectmen, School Committee, and <br />Appropriation Committee) and was duly recorded. <br /> <br />Committee members present: Bhatia, Burnell, Hornig, <br />Rosenberg, Stolz <br /> <br />Hornig implored the Selectmen and School Committee to adhere <br />to the budget timeline, making decisions so that the rest of <br />the schedule for January could be met, allowing the <br />committee to decide on capital items in parallel to <br />operating budget decisions. <br /> <br />Presenting the committee’s view of the operating budget, <br />with its current $5.5-million gap, Hornig made the following <br />points: <br /> •Big-ticket capital items. The committee feels that <br />preliminary proposals for a senior center, new DPW <br />facilities, and renovation or replacement of the next round <br />of elementary schools (Bowman and Estabrook)—all tentatively <br />scheduled for presentation to voters for a spring 2005 debt- <br />exclusion override—cannot be readied for thoughtful review <br />for this spring’s Town Meeting. Accordingly, the committee <br />recommends that planning and preliminary design funds for <br />all these projects should be deferred from consideration at <br />this spring’s Town Meeting, and considered jointly at a <br />Special Town Meeting in fall 2003, or within the spring 2004 <br />Town Meeting [perhaps as a Special Town Meeting, to <br />accelerate funding]. <br /> Selectman Enrich wondered about the implications for <br />scheduling the spring 2005 debt-exclusion override. <br /> Hornig said the matter had not been discussed with all <br />project proponents, some of whom would clearly have <br />different views (the senior center and DPW would like to <br />proceed faster), but the committee felt fall 2003 would <br />surely be timely enough to discuss planning and design <br /> <br />