|
Lexington Home Page
|
Help
|
About
|
Browse
Search
2005-10-19-CEC-min
Breadcrumb Navigation:
TownOfLexington-Public
>
WEB PUBLISHED-PUBLIC DOCUMENTS
>
MINUTES-REPORTS-COMMITTEES ARCHIVE
>
Capital Expenditures Committee-CEC
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
2005-10-19-CEC-min
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/18/2019 12:34:42 PM
Creation date
3/5/2009 1:07:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Archives
Department
Town Clerk
Keywords or Subject
CEC - Capital Expenditures Committee
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />CEC, 10/19/05, 10 AM TOB 111 <br /> <br />CWL, SS, WH, TE, GB, Jeanne Krieger, Paul Ash, Bill Hartigan, Deb <br />Brown, Michael Young, Olga Guttag, Tom Griffiths, Dawn McKenna, Pam Hoffman <br /> <br />School Capital presentation <br /> <br />Ash discusses overview of what's been done to date since he came on <br />board. Consultants have looked at roofs (prior to Hartigan coming on <br />board). "The Building Doctor" opened every air handler, univent, etc <br />at all but 2 schools. <br /> <br />Discussion of $66K (supplemental FY06) of HVAC work labeled as capital <br />(consensus is that this is really operating) and $144K (also <br />supplemental FY06) of planning money for LHS science/gym and diamond <br />auditorium roofs with project money to be appropriated in FY07 at ATM. <br /> <br />Notes that the fire curtain in the LHS auditorium is an "exposure" <br />that they're going to look at. <br /> <br />On the topic of the FY06 STM article 6 capital request: <br /> <br />Ted: Can the Bobcat $'s that were appropriated last ATM for FY06 be used <br />for this instead of for the bobcat? <br /> <br />Discussion of whether unspent $'s can be used from FY06 article 30. <br />CEC asked SC to examine this. <br /> <br />Ted: How will $144K for STM article 6 be funded. <br /> <br />TomG: suggests debt. <br /> <br />Michael Young: We earned $1.8M on secondary school arbitrage. It will <br />go into Free Cash. <br /> <br />Deb Brown: Appropriation Comm. has not discussed where STM funds will <br />come from. <br /> <br />CWL: Will schools look for D&E at STMs in the future or will the <br />ongoing cycle be to look for D&E at ATM and then request project funds <br />a year later? <br /> <br />Ash: Unclear. He somewhat prefers using the STM vehicle because he <br />would prefer not to appropriate money for a project that won't get <br />done until 15 mos later. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.