Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Meeting 03/20/03 <br />Capital Expenditure met with Appropriation in Town Offices Room 105, <br />from 7:45 to 9:20 p.m. Burnell, Hornig, Rosenberg, Stolz present. <br />Bhatia absent. Charles Lamb attending as observer. <br /> <br />Given the developments at the Selectmen's meeting 3/17, both <br />committees felt they could not support (change opinions in favor of) <br />the proposed $50,000 ADA work (now identified as Fire Station entry <br />modifications) or the proposed $350,000 Town Offices energy/lighting <br />project, because neither has been presented project details, plans, <br />or cost estimates, nor even enough information to determine whether <br />capital spending is involved. Similarly, the situation is fluid <br />regarding the citizen and Recreation proposals for some allocation of <br />tax levy and Recreation enterprise funds for work at the skate park <br />(again, there are unresolved isses: whether items meet the capital <br />threshold and whether fencing work at the skate park, if done by <br />volunteers or in-kind, would satisfy the Town's insurance and <br />risk-management criteria; plus the sufficiency of Recreation <br />enterprise funds). <br /> Accordingly, Appropriation Chair Brown will invite DPW and <br />Town engineer Peter Chalpin to brief the two committees on ADA and <br />the Town Office project 3/26 at 7:00, before Town Meeting; to be <br />followed by Recreation at 7:30. A separate skate park presentation by <br />the proposing citizens, if needed, would be 3/31. <br /> Brown will also contact the Town Manager and Selectmen to <br />note that the information provided to the finance committees <br />concerning the projects listed is insufficient for the committees to <br />take a position (and therefore, implicitly, they would be opposed to <br />the spending). <br /> On the Skyworker, Appropriation voted 5-2 to oppose the <br />project, given the option to maintain the equipment in service with <br />repairs. Capital Expenditure remains in favor of buying replacement <br />equipment, but now 4-1 (Hornig opposes); the committee will need to <br />review its position, perhaps favoring the investment on the basis of <br />maintaining a regular schedule of equipment replacement, but not <br />moving on the floor of Town Meeting to secure funding. It is worth <br />noting that with minimal equipment spending this year, the deferred <br />backlog is growing; and that given the cuts from capital this year <br />($100k plus the $170k from interest savings and the $14k from truing <br />up the recap sheet, all taken into the operating budget), capital <br />will have to fight against the perception of a huge "increase" in its <br />funding allocation next year. <br /> Likely course of Town Meeting: <br /> Article 8 items 3/31 <br /> Article 12, 14, 25 items 4/9 (The committees feel there are <br />not real proposals on the table, so action is not warranted at this <br />time; the committees would not favor giving the Selectmen sole <br />discretion, without subsequent Town Meeting approval, to act on <br />disposal of 201 Bedford Street-which authority could be used either <br />by those favoring disposal or by those trying to kill off the option, <br />without wider Town debate) <br /> Article 18 (Ledgemont), 4/14, which is hoped to be the final <br />day of Town Meeting, given the 4/16 holiday and the subsequent break <br />week. <br /> <br />John S. Rosenberg <br /> <br /> <br />