|
Lexington Home Page
|
Help
|
About
|
Browse
Search
2001-02-06-CEC-min
Breadcrumb Navigation:
TownOfLexington-Public
>
WEB PUBLISHED-PUBLIC DOCUMENTS
>
MINUTES-REPORTS-COMMITTEES ARCHIVE
>
Capital Expenditures Committee-CEC
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2001
>
2001-02-06-CEC-min
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/18/2019 12:32:48 PM
Creation date
3/5/2009 11:14:48 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Archives
Department
Town Clerk
Keywords or Subject
CEC - Capital Expenditures Committee
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />CEC minutes - 6 February 2001 (draft) <br /> <br />The meeting was called to order at 7:37 PM by the chairman. <br /> <br />Members Tom Griffths (TG), Shirley Stolz (SS), George Burnell (GB), <br />Narain <br />Bhatia (NB), and Charles Hornig (CH) were present. We were joined by <br />Deborah <br />Brown (Appropriations). <br /> <br />The minutes of the meetings 30 January 2001 (Summit V) were approved. <br /> <br />The Moderator has advised that she would discourage members of the <br />committee, especially the chairman, from taking prominent roles in <br />local <br />political campaigns. <br /> <br />Library: <br /> <br />It appears that the construction cost for the new library may exceed <br />the <br />1997 budget by as much as $3M. The fundraisers do not feel that they <br />can <br />cover this increase. There may be a request that the Town's share of <br />the <br />cost be increased by about $2M. There was much discussion about what <br />position the committee should take if this turns out to be the case. No <br />concensus was reached. Eventually, the committee took these positions: <br /> <br />VOTED: That any increase in the Town's commitment above the existing <br />$2.6M <br />commitment should be treated according to the capital policy. (That is, <br />that <br />if the increase is more than $1M that the debt be excluded from the <br />levy <br />limit by the voters.) Passed 3-2. <br /> <br />VOTED: That Town Meeting should delay action on any increase in the <br />Town's <br />share until after bids on the project are opened. Passed 3-1. <br /> <br />DPW Facility: <br /> <br />We discussed whether the committee should pursue replaciong the vehicle <br />storage building in 2001. It was agreed that we should wait some more. <br />There <br />was much discussion of the merits of various siting choices. The <br />Selectmen <br />plan to have a committee look into this after town meeting. <br /> <br />VOTED: That the committee recommend that the DPW facility remain at 201 <br />Bedford Street. Passed 4-1. <br />VOTED: That the committee recommend pursuing replacing the vehicle <br />storage <br />building and minor additions and renovations to the newer buildings at <br />a <br />total cost of about $3.5M. Passed 4-1. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.