Laserfiche WebLink
<br />CEC minutes - 21 November 2000 (approved) <br /> <br />The meeting was called to order at 7:34 PM by the chairman. <br /> <br />All members of the committee was present: Tom Griffths (TG), Shirley <br />Stolz <br />(SS), George Burnell (GB), Narain Bhatia (NB), and Charles Hornig (CH). <br /> <br />Visiting were Bill Hadley, Peter Chalpin, David Charbonneau, and Brian <br />Gilbert of the DPW. <br /> <br />The minutes of the meeting of 7 November 2000 were approved as <br />corrected. <br /> <br />The bulk of the meeting was devoted to presentation and discussion of <br />the <br />DPW capital budget. We took these up in NB's priority order. These <br />notes <br />should be read with the DPW capital requests. <br /> <br />Roads: <br /> <br />DPW proposes spending $1.0M-$1.2M/year on road maintenance. They <br />believe <br />(hope) this is enough to keep the average road quality where it is now. <br />There will be more focus on arterial streets than in the past few <br />years. <br />They expect to resurface some streets which they would have considered <br />to <br />need reconstruction in the past. <br /> <br />DPW proposes spending $3.5M/year on street reconstruction. The $3.5M <br />figure <br />is pretty arbitrary (enough to do all the reconstruction over 5 years). <br />The <br />catch-up resurfacing seems to not be in the plan anywhere. <br /> <br />After much discussion, we determined that this should be considered the <br />"street improvement" program to go with the "street maintenance" <br />program <br />above. The committee explained its proposal from last year to do both <br />the <br />catch-up resurfacing and reconstruction over 9 years, with resurfacing <br />happining first. DPW will come back with a proposal containing both <br />components over a more reasonable period of time. <br /> <br />DPW Facility: <br /> <br />DPW proposes $1M in FY02 for design, $12M in FY04 for construction. <br />This <br />assumes using the Hartwell Ave. site. The new facility would be ~80K <br />sq. <br />ft., about twice as big as what they have now. DPW is redoing the study <br />funded 2 years ago and expects something to show in a month or so. The <br />committee expressed some feeling that $12M was an unreasonable amount <br />to <br />spend. <br /> <br />The committee explained its proposal from last year to replace the barn <br />and <br />renovate and slightly expand the newer building. DPW will come back <br />with an <br />estimate of what a plan like this might cost. <br /> <br />Sewer I/I: <br /> <br />DPW has determined that the I/I program as most recently proposed will <br />not <br /> <br />