Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Lexington Town Tree Committee <br />Lexington, Massachusetts, April 8, 2004 <br /> <br />Minutes of the Meeting <br /> <br />Meeting opened at 7:30 a.m. Attendance: John Frey, Dave Pinsonneault, Jim Jones, Anne Senning, Nell Walker, <br />Jim Wood, and Karen Longeteig. In the absence, due to illness, of Secretary Susan Solomon, Karen Longeteig <br />volunteered to take the minutes. The Committee sends best wishes for improved health to Susan. <br /> <br />1. Minutes of the previous meeting of March 11, 2004, were approved. <br />2. Applications for tree removals: Dave reported that under the By-law, to date there have been 172 cases, of <br />which 82 are closed. <br />3. Tree removal application at 511 Lowell St: Dave posted notice of hearing in the Minuteman, as required. <br />He said it is a case of two oaks close to the street that the property owner wants to remove to improve sight- <br />line in exiting the driveway. The trees are healthy; he is not inclined to approve; the hearing will take place <br />on site on 4/12. <br />4. Tree City USA: Dave and Anne are still planning to go on 4/16 to Plymouth. <br />Fines under Article 34: The Town Meeting has approved the final version of the Tree By-law unanimously. <br />Dave was asked and agreed to keep track of fines. <br />5. Tree Removal application fee: A TM member has suggested that the Town charge a fee for applications to <br />remove trees. Discussion ensued on how much of the Tree Warden’s time an application and site visit <br />takes, and any such fee relative to a building permit fee already levied. Dave noted that most builders are <br />cooperative with him, and he would not like to spoil this relationship by harassing them with a fee. Any <br />money collected would probably go into general Town funds, not Tree funds. The committee suggested <br />that Dave estimate the time/cost relationship and report back at the next meeting. John will tell the <br />Selectmen that we are working on a recommendation. <br />6. Memorial Tree Fund draft brochure review: Anne had researched the Mass State program of enabling <br />funeral home directors to suggest and collect donations for trees in lieu of flowers. The money goes to the <br />State and comes back to the specified Town in Re-Leaf Grants. It is a separate program which could be <br />done alongside our own memorial tree program. Anne agreed to give this information to Douglas Funeral <br />Home. Several changes to the text of the draft brochure were agreed. Karen will put final version on disc. <br />Anne and Karen will comparison-shop printing prices at Sir Speedy, Wales, and Arlington Swifty Printing. <br />We will ask for prices for 1000 copies, full color, brochure paper. When we get estimates, we will try to <br />figure out how to pay for it. <br />7. Brookhaven, Met State and Raytheon projects -- Protecting trees: Jim Wood suggested a strategic emphasis <br />for the letters spoken of in last month’s minutes – that they be directed to the Board of Appeals, asking <br />Appeals to require of the developers the production of Specimen Tree Protection and Re-planting Plans, to <br />be delivered to the Tree Committee. (Copies of this letter would be sent to the developers.) This would <br />require a separate letter for each project. John agreed to work on it. <br />8. Inventory strategies: The DEM, Urban & Community Forestry, has grants available for up to $10,000 for <br />educational purposes. Tree inventories might fall into that category. Dave left an application form with Jim <br />Wood, our grants wizard. <br />Anne has been to a GIS workshop on watersheds and community forestry at UMass. She described their <br />standard software, “ArcView”, in which layers of data can be added to a map. This brought up two questions: <br />(1) what data we really require, and (2) who would keep the data, and where? (Town computer facilities may <br />not be adequate.) We discussed and listed the data we want: <br />Inventory limited to only street trees and protected trees <br />o <br />Location (“address”) and layout (in relation to curb and other utilities) <br />o <br />Gaps (planting opportunities) <br />o <br />Species <br />o <br />Size, both DBH and height <br />o <br />Condition (excellent, good, poor) <br />o <br />Last pruning date, by whom <br />o <br />Utility locations (overhead or underneath) <br />o <br /> <br />