Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Budget Collaboration/Summit 6 <br />March 1, 2006 <br /> <br />A joint meeting of the Board of Selectmen, School Committee and Finance Committees was <br />held on Wednesday, March 1, 2006, at 7:00 p.m. in Lexington High School Commons II. <br />Chairman Krieger, Mr. Pagett, Mr. Cohen and Mr. Manz; Mr. Valente, Town Manager; and <br />Ms. Pease, Executive Clerk were present. <br /> <br />The Chairs of the School Committee, Appropriation Committee and Capital Expenditures <br />Committee called their members to order. <br /> <br />FY2007 Capital – Updated Recommendations from Capital Expenditures Committee <br /> <br />Mr. Lamb, Capital Expenditures Committee (CEC), reviewed the capital recommendations <br />of the CEC. The Committee voted 5-0 against supporting Article 15 – Amend General By- <br />Laws to Create Energy Committee. <br /> <br />Mr. Lamb emphasized his request regarding setting aside approximately $940,000 in a <br />Stabilization Fund for Cash Capital items. <br /> <br />The Appropriations Committee has not taken positions on the capital items yet. <br /> <br />Questions were raised regarding Article 28(c)b – Building Envelope – ADA Upgrade, TOB <br />Ramp and Door. Correct amount is $150,000 and the item is presently on the municipal at- <br />risk list. CEC recommended $0 for FY2007. It should be reviewed again next year and Cary <br />Hall should be priority. <br /> <br />Discussed Article 28(a) – Sidewalks; Selectmen will consider Mr. Levine’s suggestion of <br />putting it on the at-risk list and having an override item as an annual amount less than <br />$300,000, maybe $50,000 as a way to reduce the stress on capital items. Mr. Lamb will <br />discuss with the CEC but prefers not to have it set aside. <br /> <br />Review of At-Risk Proposals (Municipal and School) <br /> <br /> Municipal <br />Mr. Valente reviewed the Municipal At-Risk List by department. <br /> <br />Mr. Levine, after reading the detailed information on each item, was concerned that the list <br />felt like the 2003 override that failed. The list includes items that affect the day-to-day <br />operations. He asked if there were any alternatives and suggested putting trash disposal at- <br />risk instead of public safety. He also suggested charging more for certain items to cover the <br />cost of the service. <br /> <br />The Selectmen do not want to start a trash war again. The function of an override is to let the <br />citizens decide the level of service they want. We have to remember that 70% of the <br /> <br />