|
Lexington Home Page
|
Help
|
About
|
Browse
Search
2007-02-28-PB-min
Breadcrumb Navigation:
TownOfLexington-Public
>
WEB PUBLISHED-PUBLIC DOCUMENTS
>
MINUTES-REPORTS-COMMITTEES ARCHIVE
>
Planning Board-PB
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2007
>
2007-02-28-PB-min
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/25/2019 3:32:07 PM
Creation date
1/13/2009 10:15:51 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Archives
Keywords or Subject
Minutes - PB - Planning Board
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />PLANNING BOARD MINUTES <br />MEETING OF February 28, 2007 <br /> <br />A regular meeting of the Lexington Planning Board, was held in Cary Auditorium in Cary Hall, and <br />called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Chairman Manz with members Hornig, Galaitsis, Canale, Zurlo and <br />planning staff McCall-Taylor, Henry and Kaufman present. <br /> <br />************************ ARTICLES FOR 2007 TOWN MEETING************************** <br />PUBLIC HEARINGS <br />Article 7, 303 Woburn Street, Rezone from RO to CRS <br />At 7:00 p.m., Chairman Manz advised the audience that the applicant had withdrawn the rezoning petition <br />and that the Board would be in recess until the next hearing scheduled for 7:15 p.m. <br /> <br />Article 6, Penalties <br />At 7:15 p.m. Ms. Manz opened the public hearing on Article 6, Penalties. There were 60 people in the <br />audience. Ms. Manz explained that the non-criminal disposition in the Code of Lexington §1.6 covers <br />violations of the Zoning Bylaw, and therefore this section 135-9(B) was seen as unnecessary. <br />Questions and Comments: Mr. Frank Sandy wanted to know if the penalties were the same under both <br />sections of the Code. Mr. Bartenstein asked the Planning Board to read these two sections of the Code - <br />general provisions and the Zoning Bylaw. Ms. Manz read both items noting there is a schedule in the <br />general provision but not in the zoning bylaw. Ms. McCall-Taylor said the current practice of the Zoning <br />Administrator is to use the schedule in the general provisions. <br /> <br />Ms Manz closed the public hearing at 7:22 p.m. On a motion duly made and seconded, it was voted to <br />recommend the article to Town Meeting. <br /> <br />Article 5, Tree Management <br />At 7:30 p.m. Ms. Manz opened the public hearing on Article 5, Tree Management. Mr. Canale’s <br />presentation stated that the objective of the bylaw amendment is to more explicitly include the protection <br />of trees as a part of the findings and determinations required when the Planning Board or the Zoning <br />Board of Appeals grants a special permit or a special permit with site plan review. A tree maintenance <br />plan would become part of the standard submission for those projects under the jurisdiction of the <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.