Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />PLANNING BOARD MINUTES <br />MEETING OF MAY 7, 2008 <br /> <br />A regular meeting of the Lexington Planning Board in the Selectmen’s Meeting Room, Town <br />Office Building was called to order at 7:05 p.m. by Chairman Hornig with members Manz and <br />Canale and planning staff McCall-Taylor, Henry and Kaufman present. Mr. Galaitsis was absent <br />and Mr. Zurlo joined the meeting in progress. <br /> <br />**********************ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS*************************** <br />502 Massachusetts Avenue: A variety of variances and special permits are being sought to <br />enable the construction of a second house on the property nominally connected to the existing <br />two-family. There is no apparent difference between this and other lots in the area. The Board <br />asked what was the hardship that required the addition and therefore justified a variance? The <br />applicant was claiming precedent was established by the abutting property that has a two-family <br />house that straddles the zoning district line between RT and RS. This should actually be an <br />argument against granting a variance. Chapter 40A, Section 10 requires that if the SPGA cannot <br />make the finding that there are “circumstances relating to the soil conditions, shape, or <br />topography of such land or structure and especially affecting such land or structures but not <br />affecting generally the zoning district is which it is located” then it has no grounds to grant a <br />variance. This splitting of a property by the lot line is the situation for probably every property <br />on the southwestern side of Mass. Ave. throughout the RT zone. <br /> <br />On a motion duly made and seconded, it was voted, 3-0, to send a letter to the Zoning Board of <br />Appeals to ask for justification of the variance and recommend disapproval of the variance and <br />special permit to allow construction of an addition. <br /> <br />Mr. Zurlo joined the meeting. <br /> <br />7 & 32 Journey’s End Lane: The applicant requested a variance to allow construction of a <br />bathroom in the cellars of units 7 and 32. The applicant wanted to construct a playroom and <br />bathroom in the cellars. While a playroom is allowed in a cellar, a bathroom is not. Since the <br /> <br />