Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />PLANNING BOARD MINUTES <br />MEETING OF APRIL 23, 2008 <br /> <br />A meeting of the Lexington Planning Board in the Selectmen’s Meeting Room, Town Office Building <br />was called to order at 7:30 p.m. by Chairman Hornig with members Zurlo, Manz, Galaitsis and Canale <br />and planning staff McCall-Taylor, Henry and Kaufman present. <br /> <br />***************************** 2008 TOWN MEETING*********************************** <br />There was a discussion of minority reports regarding Articles 53-60. Mr. Hornig wanted a discussion on <br />the issue, but not in context of Town Meeting’s discussion. Mr. Galaitsis said a report should contain both <br />opinions. Mr. Zurlo said it was a good point to show deliberation on the issues and what thoughts went <br />into the final decision of the Board in its reports. Ms. McCall-Taylor said the referenced minutes would <br />give a sense of the discussions that lead up to the final decision of the Board. <br /> <br />Mr. Hornig just wanted to address how to do the reports better next year. Mr. Canale said Mr. Hornig <br />would be speaking for the Board and could respond for them as a Board. Mr. Hornig said the Board <br />members could respond as individuals if asked. Ms. Manz said the Board needs a better way to <br />incorporate the reservations of the minority votes in the Board reports. <br /> <br />***************************SUBDIVISION ADMINISTRATION*************************** <br />63 Paul Revere Road, Preliminary Reduced Frontage Subdivision Plan, Request for Extension of Time: <br />Mr. Fred Russell on behalf of the applicant requested an extension of time. On a motion duly made and <br />seconded, it was voted, 5-0, to extend the action deadline 45 days, to June 14, 2008. <br /> <br />Grandview Avenue, Tri-Party Performance Guarantee: The applicant requested the Planning Board <br />endorse a tri-party performance guarantee requested by his lender. On a motion duly made and seconded, <br />it was voted, 5-0, to endorse the Performance Guarantee. <br /> <br />Solly’s Way, Acknowledgement of Easements and Covenant: The Registry rejected the easements and <br />covenant on Solly’s Way because the documents did not acknowledge that they were signed by the <br />applicant and the Planning Board of their of their own free will. Town Counsel made the appropriate <br />changes as per the Registry and forwarded them. The Board acknowledged before the notary that the <br />documents were signed of their own free will when they were originally endorsed. <br />Town Counsel will resubmit the documents to the Registry with the added acknowledgements. <br /> <br />