Laserfiche WebLink
Breadcrumb Navigation:
<br />PLANNING BOARD MINUTES <br />MEETING OF MARCH 12, 2008 <br /> <br />A meeting of the Lexington Planning Board in Estabrook Hall, Cary Memorial Building was called to <br />order at 8:35 p.m. by Chairman Hornig with members Zurlo, and Manz, and planning staff McCall-Taylor <br />and Henry present. Mr. Canale and Mr. Galaitsis were absent. Mr. Canale had recused himself from the <br />discussions on Special Permit Residential Development and Height Articles. <br /> <br />************************************** MINUTES ************************************* <br />Review of Minutes: The Board reviewed the minutes for the meeting of February 27, 2008. On a motion <br />duly made and seconded, it was voted, 3-0, to approve the minutes as amended. <br /> <br />******************PLANNING BOARD ORGANIZATION SCHEDULE********************** <br />The TMMA Meeting tomorrow night will allow 45 minutes for the zoning articles. A time certain for the <br />zoning articles at Town Meeting is set for April 9. Mr. Hornig will give a report under Article 2 at that <br />time. <br /> <br />************************SUBDIVISION ADMINISTRATION****************************** <br />APPROVAL NOT REQUIRED <br />Form A/2008-2, 131 Spring Street: On a motion duly made and seconded, it was voted to endorse the <br />plan entitled “ Approval Not Required Plan, Spring Street in Lexington, Massachusetts, Middlesex <br />County” dated March 5, 2008, prepared and certified by David J. Crispin, Professional Land Surveyor, <br />BSC Group, Norwell, MA, with Form A/2008-2, submitted by Patriot Partners Lexington, LLC, <br />applicant, as it does not require approval under the Subdivision Control Law. <br /> <br />************************ARTICLES FOR 2008 TOWN MEETING************************** <br />Article 49, Special Permit Residential Development: ANR’s are out of the consideration. In the case of a <br />hybrid of an ANR and something else, Mr. Hornig would prefer to require special permit with site plan <br />review for this situation. There was discussion of defining a proof plans and whether it should be within <br />the development regulations rather than the zoning by-law. <br /> <br />Article VIII changes were not substantive but include fixing the references for dwelling types and <br />correction of typographical errors. <br /> <br /> <br />