Laserfiche WebLink
<br />PLANNING BOARD MINUTES <br />MEETING OF February 6, 2008 <br /> <br />A regular meeting of the Lexington Planning Board was held in the Selectmen’s Meeting Room, Town <br />Office Building, and called to order at 7:35 p.m. by Chairman Hornig with members Zurlo, Canale, and <br />Manz and planning staff McCall-Taylor, Henry and Kaufman present. Mr. Galaitsis was absent. <br /> <br />************************ ARTICLES FOR 2008 TOWN MEETING************************** <br />PUBLIC HEARING <br />At 7:30 p.m. Mr. Hornig opened the public hearing on Articles 53-60, on Commercial Development. <br />There were 30 people in the audience. <br /> <br />Mr. Larry Smith made a presentation about the commercial zoning initiatives. Ms. Mary Jo Bohart from <br />the Chamber of Commerce was present. <br /> <br />Article 53, CM District Floor Area Ratio: This article discusses changing the maximum Floor Area Ratio <br />(FAR) in the CM district from .15 to .35. Due to the wetland exclusion the FAR would be approximately <br />equivalent to .30. There are numerous functionally obsolete buildings, which have various FAR <br />constraints making the existing FAR .22. At the proposed FAR, replacing the functionally obsolete <br />buildings would increase the development by 607,000 square feet and add $2.3 million in tax revenue. <br /> <br />Article 54, Mixed Uses in CM District: This article would allow mixed uses in CM district and stores of <br />up to 7,500 square feet. The provision of convenience services would reduce midday traffic. <br /> <br />Article 55, CRO District Floor Area Ratio: This article would change the maximum FAR in the CRO <br />district from .15 to .30. It would also allow light manufacturing in the CRO district. Due to the wetland <br />exclusion, the actual FAR would be approximately .25. Corporate headquarters density is .25. <br /> <br />Article 56, Traffic Bylaw: This article would replace the entire traffic section. Mr. Smith claimed that <br />this is a tripwire preventing development and it hasn’t been enforced since its inception. It would modify <br />the existing language and allow the Special Permit Granting Authority and the Building Commissioner to <br />grant permits even if the LOS requirement is not met. <br /> <br />