Laserfiche WebLink
<br />PLANNING BOARD MINUTES <br />MEETING OF JANUARY 23, 2008 <br /> <br />A meeting of the Lexington Planning Board in Estabrook Hall, Cary Hall was called to order at 7:30 p.m. <br />by Chairman Hornig with members Zurlo, Galaitsis, Manz, and planning staff McCall-Taylor, Henry and <br />Kaufman present. Mr. Canale who has recused himself from the discussion of the Article IX amendments <br />was absent. <br /> <br />***************************ARTICLES FOR 2008 TOWN MEETING*********************** <br />Mr. Hornig opened the public information meeting at 7:30 p.m. on the Planning Board’s proposed <br />amendment to the Zoning Bylaw for Special Permit Residential Developments. There were 25 people in <br />the audience. <br /> <br />Mr. Hornig’s presentation explained the changes, based on the experience of the last 12 years, would <br />make the Zoning Bylaw simpler and easier to understand. The presentation provided an overview of what <br />the bylaw would require and new terminology. <br /> <br />Audience Comments and Questions: Mr. Patrick Mehr asked what are we really trying to achieve and <br />why spend this time? The Floor Area Ratio (FAR) would be good to introduce now. If we want smaller <br />houses why allow an increase in the Gross Floor Area (GFA)? Why is the Board following this practice if <br />houses are too large, instead he proposed a friendly amendment cutting the GFA by 25%. Mr. Hornig <br />responded the effort was to simplify the bylaw. If the bylaw were so restrictive it would make the whole <br />bylaw entirely irrelevant because no one would use it. This is a practical alternative to large single-family <br />homes. The FAR would need to be applied to all houses, which is not being done now. Ms. Manz said <br />they need to work with developers or the town will get only large single-family homes as-of-right. <br /> <br />Mr. Arthur Katz asked if there was a way to determine if the incentive bonus would work to provide <br />affordable housing. Mr. Zurlo said there were no specific numbers, but giving a 20% density bonus was <br />generous and would be generous based on what we know to be typical incentives offered through other <br />bylaws. <br /> <br />Mr. Joel Adler said there would be no requirement for open space, but we want to promote open space. <br />Mr. Hornig said there was be an increase in the amount of common open space required, it was just the <br />requirement for useable open space that would be deleted. Mr. Adler said wetlands would just be thrown <br /> <br />