Laserfiche WebLink
<br />PLANNING BOARD MINUTES <br />MEETING OF JANUARY 16, 2008 <br /> <br />A meeting of the Lexington Planning Board in Cary Auditorium, Cary Hall, was called to order at 7:30 <br />p.m. by Chairman Hornig with members Canale, Galaitsis, Manz, and planning staff McCall-Taylor, <br />Henry and Kaufman present. Mr. Zurlo was absent. <br /> <br />***************************ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS****************************** <br />Lexington Technology Park Definitive Site Development and Use Plan: Mr. Canale recused himself <br />since he is an abutter to an abutter. Ed Grant, Robert Buckley, Brian Lawler and John Hart made the <br />presentation. Mr. Grant noted that in April 2004, Town Meeting approved the Preliminary Site <br />Development and Use Plan (PSDUP) and CD rezoning. In October 2007, a Special Town Meeting <br />approved a Tax Incentive Financing agreement with Shire, Inc. There was an Approval Not Required <br />proposal that re-lotted the parcels to separate 125 Spring Street, 500 Patriot Way, and the parcel covered <br />by the TIF. <br /> <br />The Definitive Site Development and Use Plan is coming before the Zoning Board of Appeals (ZBA) to <br />apply for a special permit with site plan review confirming that the definitive plans conform to what was <br />approved at Town Meeting. Limited revisions can be made with the approval of the ZBA. The plan does <br />substantially comply with the PSDUP, but the applicant is requesting approval of some revisions because <br />of biotech manufacturing needs. The applicant has given the ZBA alternatives by applying for variances <br />as well as a special permit to address the dimensional changes. <br /> <br />Attorney Bob Buckley, of Riemer & Braunstein, LLP, said the layout is virtually the same and his legal <br />opinion is that the ZBA can grant the special permit. The plan includes a gross floor area increase due to <br />the mechanical needs of the biotech use, but the net floor area remains the same. The requested five-foot <br />increase in height for building 400 is for exhaust and boiler stacks for a safer operation and is due to wind <br />wake analysis. He characterized the change in the impervious surface ratio as a scrivener’s error, as the <br />square footage of the entire parcel was inadvertently misstated in the PSDUP. <br /> <br />John Hart, engineer, said the building envelopes were the same, the existing road is maintained, there is <br />no work around the 500 building or within the wetland buffer. The new numbers include the possible <br />expansion of only the 400 building. While some parking spaces (196 spaces) are held in reserve, they are <br />included in the calculations. The project has been before the Conservation Commission, and a further <br />hearing is scheduled. <br /> <br />