|
Lexington Home Page
|
Help
|
About
|
Browse
Search
2005-04-14-ZBA-min
Breadcrumb Navigation:
TownOfLexington-Public
>
WEB PUBLISHED-PUBLIC DOCUMENTS
>
MINUTES-REPORTS-COMMITTEES ARCHIVE
>
Board of Appeals-ZBA
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
2005-04-14-ZBA-min
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/25/2019 11:34:22 AM
Creation date
12/19/2007 9:38:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Archives
Keywords or Subject
Minutes - ZBA - Zoning Board of Appeals
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
DRAFT MINUTES of the Lexington Zoning Board of Appeals — April 14, 2005 <br /> Present: Chairman Judith J. Uhrig, Arthur C. Smith, Nyles N. Barnert, John J. McWeeney and Maura <br /> L. Sheehan <br /> Petition Address: 79 Robbins Road <br /> The Chairman opened the hearing at 8:28 PM by reading the legal notice and described information <br /> received from the Petitioner, other Boards and Commissions relative to the Petition. . No comments <br /> were received from any other board or committee. <br /> Stephanie Blout, owner of the property, presented the petition along with her architect Mike Shirley. <br /> The relief sought is for a variance from side yard set backs from 135.35, table 2, Dimensional Controls <br /> to construct an addition. Petitioner is asking to eliminate garage and replace with addition keeping in <br /> scale of neighborhood homes as to have minimum impact on neighbors. <br /> Questions from the Board: <br /> John McWeeney: What is the size of the building now compared to what is will be? Answer: Not <br /> really sure, can figure it out for you if you would like. <br /> Arthur Smith: Where will you park? Answer: We will be maintaining the existing driveway. <br /> Maura Sheehan: Asked applicant to explain how topography of the lot impacts need /request for <br /> variance. <br /> John McWeeney: Why can't you put the addition to the back? Answer: Site falls away dramatically. <br /> John McWeeney: What we look for is do you have a case with the topography of the land. Answer: <br /> We have a large oak tree about 100 years old in the front yard. It would dramatically change the <br /> drainage if we were to take that out. <br /> Mike Shirley, Architect: Discussed the slope in the back and the concern that the building would appear <br /> quite high with a 3 -story facade to the back. <br /> Judy Uhrig: You already infringe on the setback. There really isn't anything wrong with the shape of <br /> the lot. <br /> Nyles Barnert: How much narrower could you make it? Really couldn't. <br /> The petitioner brought two letters in favor of the project from neighbors: Philip Sullivan, 77 Robins <br /> Road and Janice and Stephen Sarmanian of 1 Plymouth Road. <br /> Chairman, Judy Uhrig, read a letter in opposition from David and Julie Yen. <br /> David and Julie Yen also spoke in opposition at the meeting. Their concerns were regarding other <br /> alternatives to the location of the addition and drainage. <br /> Final comments from architect Mike Shirley: A lot of thought went into this addition. Putting the <br /> addition anywhere else adds to the footprint. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.