Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Meeting Notes <br />Ad hoc Leary Property Community Housing Task Force <br />September 13, 2010 9:00 a.m. <br />Room 207, Town Office Building <br /> <br />Present: Bob Bicknell, George Burnell, MarilynFenollosa, Stephen Keane, Wendy <br /> <br />Manz, Deb Mauger, Maryann McCall-Taylor, Lester Savage and Betsey Weiss <br />Absent: Bill Hays, Aaron Henry, <br /> <br /> <br />Housekeeping <br />Lex Savage elected chair <br /> <br /> <br />Minutes of August 25, 2010 approved <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />General discussion <br />Community Preservation Coalition- Maryann McCall-Taylor reported that she <br /> <br /> <br />had talked with Kathy Roth and Stuart Saginor regarding the use of CPA <br />money. The money for the acquisition was appropriated from the Open Space <br />Reserve, the Unbudgeted Reserves and the Undesignated Fund Balance of the <br />Community Preservation Fund, so the source of the funds would not limit the <br />use (i.e. historic preservation or community housing), but the scope of the <br />article appears to limit it to community housing. Although the report spoke <br />of historic preservation, the motion only mentioned conservation and <br />community housing purposes. Mr. Saginor felt that the only use allowed for <br />the 30,022 square foot lot is community housing. It would have to go back to <br />Town Meeting to change to a historic preservation use, and probably would <br />need a 2/3’s vote. If it were to be a historic preservation project, there would <br />need to be a deed restriction approved by the Mass. Historical Commission. <br />They might require adherence to the Secretary of the Interior’s standards. <br />Massachusetts Affordable Housing Alliance (MAHA) – Shelly Goehring had <br /> <br /> <br />been contacted regarding affordable housing development. She felt that a <br />market rate unit could be included in the development but no CPA funds <br />could be used, so a proportion of land costs would have to be allocated to the <br />market rate unit. <br />Existing house- There was a wide-ranging discussion about the future of the <br /> <br /> <br />existing house. Should it be preserved as part of a community farm? Could <br />we honor the past use by putting up a plaque and developing housing that in <br />the style of New England farm houses as done in Bedford? How do we <br />provide affordable housing in a challenged structure? What do the neighbors <br />want? Could a person with affordable level income afford the construction <br />costs? Perhaps the year of the demolition delay could be used to find a <br />curator? Would it be possible to live in the house while restoring it? Have the <br />Building Commission look at the house and outline the minimum to get a <br />Certificate of Occupancy. Does putting other units on the site destroy the <br />historic value? <br /> <br />