Laserfiche WebLink
Breadcrumb Navigation:
OFFICE OF E. IItVING SMITH, <br /> SMITH & LUDDEN, CHARLES M. LUDDEN. <br /> COUNSELLORS AT LAW. ' one. t <br /> 5 PEMBERTON SQUARE, <br /> 1>OSTO N, MASS. <br /> Subscribers to Sloan's Legal and -- July- 6.t -------------- -189 5 <br /> Financial Register and Mem- <br /> bers of the Continental <br /> Collection Union. <br /> Webster Smith, Esq.., <br /> Lexington, Mass , <br /> Dear Sir <br /> We inclose th:e opinion which you requested. The case which <br /> we refer to in the opinion is exactly in point and holds that you <br /> still can act under the Public Statutes notwithstanding the special <br /> act j and as it happens'-the special act in the Braintree case was <br /> almost word for word -as the special act in our case. Where being no <br /> possible doubt about the question we have not sent the opinion to mr. <br /> Scott as no lawyer can dispute the konc lusi ons we reach after reading <br /> the case. If you still think we had better send it down to him <br /> we have a copy which we have retained for that purposei but titre think <br /> 1 that in view of this you wil1, not think it worth while. <br /> Very t-_rozly yours Q <br />