Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Page 1 of 6 <br /> <br />Selectmen’s Meeting <br />April 3, 2019 <br />A meeting of the Lexington Board of Selectmen was called to order at 6:00 p.m. on Wednesday, <br />April 3, 2019 in the Selectmen’s Meeting Room of the Town Office Building. Ms. Barry, Chair; <br />Mr. Pato; Mr. Lucente; Ms. Hai and Mr. Sandeen were present as well as Mr. Malloy, Town <br />Manager; Ms. Axtell, Assistant Town Manager and Ms. Katzenback, Executive Clerk. <br />2019 Annual Town Meeting <br />Mr. Lucente submitted the Ad Hoc Crematory Study Committee Interim Report to the Board. <br />He explained the report contains an Executive Summary, the Committee Charge, background on <br />current Westview Cemetery Building, Westview Cemetery Building options, cremation process, <br />cremation regulation, market trends, and the committee’s next steps. <br />The Board was in agreement that the Ad Hoc Crematory Study Committee Interim Report can be <br />released to Town Meeting. <br /> Article Discussion/Positions <br />Possible Reconsideration – Article 39: Amend Zoning Bylaw – Limited Site Plan Review <br />(Citizen Petition) <br />Ms. Colburn, School Committee, explained the School Committee plans to move for <br />reconsideration of Article 39 on Monday, April 8, 2019 in order to offer the following <br />amendment: Notwithstanding any other provision of this chapter, the use of land or structures for <br />educational purposes by the Lexington Public Schools on land owned or leased by the Town of <br />Lexington or Lexington Public Schools shall not be subject to site plan review pursuant to § 9.5. <br />She stated that Article 39 was intended to require limited site plan review for building projects <br />by private schools, religious institutions and daycare centers, in order to afford abutters a small <br />degree of notice and opportunity for comment, where before there had been none. The School <br />Committee learned only after the close of debate that, in fact, the article would also require <br />Lexington Public School projects to undergo site plan review by the Planning Board which <br />would add time and expense to school projects that already benefit from extensive public <br />process. <br />Ms. Hai asked for clarification regarding the abutter notification used for School Building <br />projects. Ms. Colburn explained direct abutters get notice of both abutter and community <br />meetings and neighbors beyond the abutters get notice of the community meetings. <br /> <br />Mr. Pato suggested that the School Committee consider having every School building project <br />notify abutters, not just the Massachusetts School Building Authority (MSBA) projects. <br /> <br />Ms. Barry suggested that a standard radius be set for abutter identification for the School <br />Building Projects. <br /> <br /> <br />