Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2018-06-25-CEC-min Y Minutes of the Lexington Capital Expenditures Committee (CEC) Meeting June 25, 2018 APRIL 19'" �d N4i„'47�r Location and Time: Town Office Building, Reed Room; 7:45 A.M. Members Present: Charles Lamb, Chair; David Kanter, Vice-Chair & Clerk; Sandy Beebee;Wendy Manz; and Frank Smith Members Absent: Rod Cole Others Present: Sara Arnold, Recording Secretary Documents Presented: • Notice of CEC Meeting, June 25, 2018 • Draft #3 Minutes of the CEC Meeting, June 6, 2018 • CEC Input to the Board of Selectmen's (BoS's) Goals Setting for Fiscal Years (FYs) 2019 & 2020, May 28, 2018, with Commentary Prepared by Mr. Kanter, 24 Jun 2018 Based on BoS Comments at its 19 Jun 2018 Meeting Call to Order: Mr. Lamb called the meeting to order at 7:46 A.M. Approval of Minutes: Mr. Kanter presented three proposed edits to the Draft #3 Minutes of the CEC meeting, June 6, 2018. A Motion was made and seconded to approve those Minutes as amended. Vote: 4-0-1 (Mr. Smith abstained because he had not attended that meeting.) Member Concerns and Liaison Reports: Mr. Kanter reported the following regarding the June 191" meeting of the BoS: • The BoS approved Bond Anticipation Notes (BANs) totaling $12,116,855. Factoring in the $113,777.27 premium received from the winning bidder, J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, the net interest cost for the Town is 1.56%, which is an increase from the 1.40% on the BANs issued this January and the 0.94% on those issued last June. • The BoS continued its goals-setting efforts—the primary purpose the meeting. The BoS reviewed 52 recommended goals—some as carryovers from the FY2018 & FY2019 goals; most as inputs from the staff, Town committees, and other Town bodies. The inputs had been ranked based on the previously identified interests expressed by the individual BoS members. During the review, the Board agreed that a number of goals could be merged. The Town Manager's Office will prepare a goals list that reflects the Board's discussion and positions. This Committee's recommendations were addressed by the BoS, as follows: ➢ Overall Capital Planning: This was identified as a high-priority carryover and did not include addressing a separate policy regarding funding durations for capital projects as recommended by this Committee. ➢ Town-wide Facilities Master Plan: This was identified as a high-priority carryover. The BoS supported the creation of another Ad hoc Town-wide Master Planning Committee to ensure both Municipal and Schools planning are integrated so the result is a truly a Town-wide plan. Page 1 of 3 Minutes of the Lexington Capital Expenditures Committee (CEC) Meeting June 25, 2018 ➢ Capital Project Matrix/Timeline Template: This on-going, combined effort by Jon Himmel, Chair, Permanent Building Committee, Mark Sandeen, Chair, Sustainability Committee, and Town staff to develop consistent standards and processes for building projects was identified as a high priority. Carl Valente, Town Manager, advised the Board that while progress has been made in developing this product, there remain unresolved issues regarding what details should be proposed as being in the policy. ➢ Use of Discretionary Funds: This was ranked in the last 20 goal recommendations on the list. As time was running out for the BoS meeting, the Chair asked each member to identify any one or two in that last group that needed to be discussed at this meeting. This input by this Committee was not raised by any member, so it was not addressed. ➢ Sidewalks: This Committee's recommendation regarding a policy of separate funding requests for the different locations of sidewalk capital projects was mentioned, but no position taken. ➢ Community Housing Policy: As there were several different inputs that would fall under this goal, it was noted that all the stakeholders associated with community housing policies need to develop a consensus opinion on recommended changes to the policy. It was also mentioned that this Committee's input about a new staff position to assist the Lexington Housing Assistance Board (LexHAB) was surprising in that LexHAB has not advanced a similar request. ➢ Lexington Community Center Expansion:This was identified as the last of the high priority inputs, but that the project requires additional process and evaluation. Ms. Beebee and Mr. Smith reported on the June 141" Financial Summit, which focused on two School Department financial requests, as follows: • $1.1 million for additional laboratory-equipped classrooms needed by the fall of 2019: ➢ The School Committee reviewed the available options for addressing the continued increases in enrollment and their impact on the science program. Programmatic changes would not necessarily solve the problem. ➢ A funding source for adding new laboratory space has not been identified. The schedule for this project identifies funding approval at a fall 2018 Special Town Meeting for design development between November 2018 and February 2019, followed by the bid process, selecting a contractor in March or April, and construction during the summer of 2019. This Committee is interested in just what fund source could be available to support that proposed project schedule which entails contracting, likely twice, before any FY2020 funding would be available. Also discussed was the cost to taxpayers of maintaining the quality of education that Lexington offers. Page 2 of 3 Minutes of the Lexington Capital Expenditures Committee (CEC) Meeting June 25, 2018 • $106,000 needed to begin the next School Master Planning effort: ➢ Two options for funding have been explored: Using funds from the School Department 2018 operating budget or from the Appropriation Committee's 2018 Reserve Fund which can only be used for extraordinary or unforeseen expenditures—terms which are left for that committee to define. The latter option is considered justified because of a recent, unforeseen, advice by bond counsel that the Motion for the appropriation (which is already obligated in a contract) which funds the SC had originally planned to use only allows for the use to be financed over time—which is not the case for this effort. ➢ The SC is in favor of using the Appropriation Committee's Reserve Funds, rather than using operating funds for a non-operating expense. Mr. Valente said that that only operating use of operating funds is the normal practice, but non-operating use could be allowed if it is made publicly clear that is being done. ➢ The Appropriation Committee, which must approve use of the Reserve Fund, has not taken a position, but is expected to do so at its meeting in two days (on the 271"). The School Committee has approved an operating budget transfer to cover this effort if the Reserve Fund use is not approved. Mr. Lamb reported that, to-date, Deborah Brown, the Town Moderator and appointing authority for this Committee, has not found a candidate for filling the open position on this Committee. Suggestions from this Committee and others are welcomed. Adjourn: A Motion was made and seconded at 8:18 A.M. to adjourn. Vote:5-0. These Minutes were approved by the CEC at its meeting on September 12, 2018. Page 3 of 3