Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br /> March 30, 2016 Adjourned Session of the 2016 Annual Town Meeting, cont <br /> 2. Modify § 135-6 9 5.3, Dimensional Standards applicable to Special Permit Residential <br /> Developments, by adding the underlined text to read as follows <br /> 3. Yard & Height Requirements. Yards required by § 135-4 0 and the height limit of& 135- <br /> 4.3.5 apply to the perimeter of the site, but are not applicable within the site <br /> 3. Modify § 135-8.4 1 by adding the underlined text and removing the struck-though text to read as <br /> follows <br /> 8.4.1 No Increase in Nonconforming Nature. Nonconforming one-family and two-family <br /> dwellings may be reconstructed, extended, altered, or structurally changed, or a new accessory <br /> structure may be constructed, upon a determination by the Building Commissioner that the <br /> nonconforming nature of the structure is not increased. Such determination will be deemed to <br /> - be as of right and the applicant entitled to the issuance of a building permit where each structure <br /> is reconstructed, extended, altered, or changed so as to (a) contain the improvements within the <br /> site coverage and height of an existing structure; or(b) comply with the following side yard <br /> requirements and the front and rear yard requirements of§ 135 1 9apnlicable yard and height <br /> requirements of& 4 0, except that the side yard may be reduced as noted below- <br /> If actual lot frontage is Side yard must be at least <br /> 100 feet or more Not less than 15 feet <br /> More than 75 feet but less not more than 100 feet Not less than 12 feet <br /> More than 50 feet but not more than 75 feet Not less than 10 feet <br /> More than 0 feet but not more than 50 feet or less* Not less than 7 5 feet <br /> NOTES * but not 0 <br /> 7 40 p.m. Mr Canale presented the request action, noting that the Planning Board's Report on <br /> Article 39 had been previously received and placed on file. He explained that passage of Article 39 <br /> would limit the height of certain houses close to property lines. He made a lengthy presentation <br /> showing examples and sketches, and reported unanimous support of the Planning Board. <br /> 7 53 p.m. Selectman Michelle Ciccolo reported support of the Board in a(4-1)vote. <br /> 7 56 p.m. Members John Rossi, Pct. 1, and Dawn McKenna, Pct. 6, spoke in opposition, <br /> stating financial burden to homeowners. <br /> 8.06 p.m. Victoria Blier, Pct. 9, spoke in favor <br /> 8.08p.m. Resident Robert Martin, 5 Audubon Road, spoke in opposition, stating that the <br /> amendments discriminated against small lot owners. <br /> 8 18p.m. Steven Heinrich, Pct. 3, asked whether any small lots existed where owners would be <br /> prevented from adding a second story due to the proposed zoning amendment. Mr Canale <br /> responded that he was not aware of any such lots. <br /> 8.24 p.m. Rodney Cole, Pet. 9, spoke in favor <br /> 8.24 p.m. Following electronic vote tallying, the Moderator declared Article 39 Adopted by <br /> more than the necessary two-thirds by a vote of: <br /> I Yes No Abstain <br /> I 138 31 3 <br /> 8.27 p.m. Selectman Joseph Pato moved to take Articles 39, 40 and 41 out of order. Motion <br /> Adopted. <br /> 8.27 p.m. Presented by Charles Hornig,member, Planning Board. <br /> ARTICLE 40: AMEND ZONING BYLAW—ACCESSORY APARTMENTS <br /> MOTION: That the Zoning By-Laws of the Town be amended as set forth in the motion <br /> attached to the report of the Planning Board on this article, a copy of which is on file <br /> with the Town Clerk and the Planning Board, and further that non-substantive <br /> changes to the numbering of this bylaw be permitted in order that it be in compliance <br /> with the numbenng format of the Code of the Town of Lexington. <br /> That Chapter 135 of the Code of the Town of Lexington, the Zoning Bylaw, be amended as follows <br />