Laserfiche WebLink
DRAFT DRAFT DR�FT <br /> Lexington Sidewalk Coinm.ittee Meeting A�Iinutes <br /> Monday, April 1, 2013, 9 AM <br /> Battin Aaditorium, Cary Memorial Hall <br /> Present: Judy Crocicer,Ma�y Hosmer Fanucci,Betiina McGimsey,Francine Stieglitz,Jeny van <br /> Hook;Meinbers absent: Jeanne Canale; Liaisons: Hank Ma.nz(B�S), Marc Valenti(DPW), <br /> Elaine Celi(Transportation};Guests: Residents of the Winthrop Street neighborhood <br /> Juditli Crocker, Chau-man of the Sidewal.lc Comtnittee, called the meeting of the Sidewalk <br /> Committee(SWC)to order at 9:02 AM. The puipose of this meeting was for proponents and <br /> opponeuts of the proposed concept of completing the Winthrop Street sidewallc from Highland <br /> Ave ta Walthan St to sha�-e their views with the SWC.The meeting was announced as being <br /> recorded in arder to aid today's Comnuttee secretary in obtaining an accurate and complete set of <br /> minutes as possible. Attendees were also asked to use the sign-inn sheets. <br /> It was made clear by Judy Cracker that the St�TC committee has within its charge the authority to <br /> only c�ffer recoimnendatians wi.th regard to any proposed sidewallc project to the Board of <br /> Selectmen. It does not have jurisdiction to decide whether the sidewalk is actually financed or <br /> constructed, or deterniine what side of the street it should be located. <br /> The parameters of the meeting were established at its start. In order to provide equal opporiunity <br /> for citizen corrunent, each member af the audience would have the opportunity to speak once foY- <br /> a ina�mlun of 3 minutes. The speaker would be warned that their time is near completion at the 2 <br /> _ ininutes and 30 seconds mark. Proponents were asked to use the"Yes"microphone. Opponents <br /> were asked to use the"No"microphone. Abutters were invited ta be the first ones to make theu• <br /> presentations.The order of speakers alternated Uetween those for aud those against the proposed <br /> sidew�.lk. Further,the coimnittee indicated that it would make no comment an the project today. <br /> Discussion among the members of the SWC would occur at the May 6,2013 meeting. At that <br /> time, the Committee will not take citizen comments and members will vote on whether or not to <br /> recoimnend that the proposed Winthrop 5t�-eet side��alk project be approved. <br /> As of April l, 2013,the SWC had.received a total of 40 letters regarding this project. Some of <br /> these are from individuals unable to attend today's meering. Dan Kriapka, an a.butter,respectfully <br /> requested th.at abutters be the first ones to express their opinions.This request was granted. <br /> Speakers <br /> L Louis Counts, 45 Winthrop Street <br /> NIr. Counts Is in favor of the sidewaik. He moved froxn Han.cock Street to Winthrop Street i.n <br /> September 2012. He has observed peaple of a11 ages walking in the road. He believes this is an <br /> issue of public safety. <br /> 2. Dan Krupka,40 Winthrap St�•eet <br /> Mr. Kruplca emphasized that he is not against public safety. He believes there are other means <br /> available for solving safety issues. He referenced the role and protocol used by the Traffic Safety <br /> Advisory Committee(TSAC}in assessing traffic problems.He would like an eitensive tr�affic <br /> study conducted to help understand traf.fic flow at his location. According to Mr. Krupka, during <br /> a mid-March inid-week personal survey of pedestrians in the area,the average pedest�-ian i�affic <br />