HomeMy WebLinkAbout2006-11-09-DAC-MIN
LEXINGTON DESIGN ADVISORY COMMITTEE
November 9, 2006
To:
Board of Appeals
Re:
1720 Massachusetts Ave.
Battle Green Inn Development (BGI)
At its regular meeting on November 7, 2006, the DAC was presented with modifications
to the design of BGI that was approved at Town Meeting. In general, the DAC found the
changes to be “minor in nature” and an improvement to the project as a whole.
Although material samples were provided and specific details discussed, the development
team is seeking advice from HDC and DAC before finalizing selections. The DAC made
the following comments:
1. Reduce the quantity and impact of sign lighting on the surrounding sidewalk. The
lighting should be minimal, enough to support it’s intended function, while allowing
retail storefront and street lighting to light public sidewalks (consistent in effect, with
other sign lighting techniques in town). A “dark sky”, cut off fixture was recommended
for this application.
2. It was recommended that the developer consider two street trees along Waltham Street
(there are currently no street trees along Waltham Street). It was suggested by the
developer that funding for this effort be drawn from the town improvement fund, created
by this project, at the discretion of the Board of Selectmen. The DAC strongly
encourages the implementation of street trees at this location.
3. The “water struck” brick sample was preferred over the “sand struck” sample, for its
color and variation in appearance, similar to brick used on adjacent buildings.
4. The DAC recommended the entry drive courtyard screening element be reconsidered
to address the view from Waltham Street (more planting/view, like what is rendered on
the elevations, but not supported in the details presented).
5. The DAC requested that the color of the railings be reconsidered (presented as white).
Although the proposed color would match the trim used on the building, there was some
concern over the ability to keep the railings clean and white when used on railings or
fencing tends to be more opaque in appearance. A darker color tends to be softer in
appearance, creating a filigree of transparency on the building, minimizing the overall
massing.
The DAC recommends this project be approved, with the above-mentioned
considerations, and appreciates the thoroughness with which the developer continues to
exhibit on this important project.
Respectfully submitted,
Colin P. Smith AIA, Chairman
Lexington Design Advisory Committee
Cc: Board of Appeals
Board of Selectmen