|
Lexington Home Page
|
Help
|
About
|
Browse
Search
2015-01-15-WALKS-min
Breadcrumb Navigation:
TownOfLexington-Public
>
WEB PUBLISHED-PUBLIC DOCUMENTS
>
MINUTES-REPORTS-COMMITTEES ARCHIVE
>
DISSOLVED COMMITTEES
>
Sidewalk Committee-WALKS
>
Minutes
>
2010-2019
>
2015 (last active)
>
2015-01-15-WALKS-min
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/2/2019 4:11:08 PM
Creation date
10/26/2015 9:15:01 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Archives
Keywords or Subject
Minutes - WALKS - Sidewalk Committee
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />1)Public Comment: Comments and concerns from the community <br /> Prospect Hill Rd – Sarah McSweeney et al <br /> Sarah Chamberlain attended the meeting to discuss the Prospect Hill <br />sidewalk project. She wanted to know about the feasibility study and survey. Have <br />they been done? The discussion was focused on how to address Town Meeting <br />when the time comes. It is important to be up to date on the process to follow <br />when requesting a sidewalk. Details are located on the SWC website, <br />http://ci.lexington.ma.us/committees/sidewalk.cfm. <br />Craig wanted to know the process for updating the SWC website. Jeanne is going <br />to speak with Lynne Pease to find out. <br />New guidelines for the process to request a new sidewalk were distributed. <br />According to Craig, steps 1 – 6 had been followed thus far for Prospect Street. <br />Michelle indicated there had been a survey but no engineering report on the <br />project. Michelle will be attending the December 15 Selectmen’s meeting. She <br />said it is not clear to her that there is bandwidth or funding for a sidewalk on <br />Prospect Hill. Information for the 12/15 meeting includes drawings, grade, etc for <br />the project. <br />A survey reflects existing conditions. An engineering study shows what <br />improvements would be. <br />Judy talked about TSAC and the divide between municipal and school jurisdiction. <br />She suggested that MaryEllen Dunne may be unaware of the SWC protocol for <br />sidewalks. Prospect Hill is a route to school for many walkers. Craig indicated that <br />last month’s meeting was rather disorderly. <br />He suggested finding out the status of the feasibility study for this project. The <br />SWC needs to find out the status of step 7 and report back to Sarah Chamberlain. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.