Laserfiche WebLink
<br />1)Public Comment: Comments and concerns from the community <br /> Prospect Hill Rd – Sarah McSweeney et al <br /> Sarah Chamberlain attended the meeting to discuss the Prospect Hill <br />sidewalk project. She wanted to know about the feasibility study and survey. Have <br />they been done? The discussion was focused on how to address Town Meeting <br />when the time comes. It is important to be up to date on the process to follow <br />when requesting a sidewalk. Details are located on the SWC website, <br />http://ci.lexington.ma.us/committees/sidewalk.cfm. <br />Craig wanted to know the process for updating the SWC website. Jeanne is going <br />to speak with Lynne Pease to find out. <br />New guidelines for the process to request a new sidewalk were distributed. <br />According to Craig, steps 1 – 6 had been followed thus far for Prospect Street. <br />Michelle indicated there had been a survey but no engineering report on the <br />project. Michelle will be attending the December 15 Selectmen’s meeting. She <br />said it is not clear to her that there is bandwidth or funding for a sidewalk on <br />Prospect Hill. Information for the 12/15 meeting includes drawings, grade, etc for <br />the project. <br />A survey reflects existing conditions. An engineering study shows what <br />improvements would be. <br />Judy talked about TSAC and the divide between municipal and school jurisdiction. <br />She suggested that MaryEllen Dunne may be unaware of the SWC protocol for <br />sidewalks. Prospect Hill is a route to school for many walkers. Craig indicated that <br />last month’s meeting was rather disorderly. <br />He suggested finding out the status of the feasibility study for this project. The <br />SWC needs to find out the status of step 7 and report back to Sarah Chamberlain. <br /> <br />