Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> Minutes of the Community Preservation Committee <br />Tuesday, March 18, 2014 <br />4:00 pm, Parker Room <br />Town Office Building, 1625 Massachusetts Avenue <br />Present: <br />Committee Members: <br />Marilyn Fenollosa, Chair; Richard Wolk, Vice-Chair; Richard Canale, <br />Norman Cohen, David Horton, Jeanne Krieger, Leo McSweeney, Robert Pressman and Sandra <br />Shaw. <br />Administrative Assistant <br />: Nathalie Rice <br />Also in attendance were Joe Pato, member of the Board of Selectmen (BOS); David Kanter, Vice- <br />Chair of the Capital Expenditures Committee (CEC), Glenn Parker, Chair of the Appropriation <br />Committee (AP) and Rob Addelson, Assistant Town Manager for Finance. <br />The meeting was called to order at 4:04 pm. by Ms. Fenollosa. <br />1.Updates on FY15 Projects and Funding <br />a.) Cary Memorial Upgrades Project, Article 2, Special Town Meeting - <br />Rob Addelson, <br />Assistant Town Manager for Finance was in attendance to discuss the funding options for the <br />Cary Memorial Upgrades project, currently estimated at $8,241,350 (and proposed to be bonded <br />over a 10-year period). Mr. Addelson explained that at the Board of Selectmen’s meeting on the <br />previous evening, Selectman Joe Pato presented an updated estimate of student growth which <br />indicated a possible increased demand for school facilities in the upcoming 5+ years. Mr. Pato <br />then reiterated his points, explaining that current trends in Lexington’s demographics showed a <br />significant increase in recent years (from 20% to 45%) in the number of families with school age <br />children who reside in apartments. This growing demographic, among other factors, forced Mr. <br />Pato to rethink the Cary Memorial Upgrades project and the wisdom of burdening the Town with <br />long term debt. Mr. Pato stated that if a new school was needed in Lexington, the cost could be <br />up to $50M, particularly if land costs were included. He noted that although the renovations to <br />the Cary Memorial Building were necessary, they were to some extent discretionary. He said he <br />voted against the Cary project for this reason. (The Board of Selectmen’s vote was 3-2, with the <br />Chair siding with Mr. Pato.) <br />Ms. Fenollosa responded to Mr. Pato’s comments by noting that the CPA was passed in <br />Lexington because historic preservation, open space acquisition, affordable housing and <br />recreation, have historically been poorly funded because they arediscretionary. She said it was <br />the intent of the State statute to specifically “represent” these important community needs. She <br />stressed the importance of leveraging State funding which provides Lexington with nearly a <br />quarter of its CPA funding via the “State match”. Ms. Fenollosa stated that the Cary Memorial <br />Upgrades project was a CPC priority, having been under consideration for over three years. <br />Delaying the project, she cautioned, would ultimately make it more expensive. She asked if Mr. <br />Pato also objected to the funding of the Community Center Renovation project, to which he <br />replied that he did not, since that project involved minimal debt ($451,000) and was necessary to <br />1 <br /> <br />