Laserfiche WebLink
Lexington Sidewalk Committee Meeting Minutes <br />Monday March 5, 2012 at gam <br />Present: Jerry Van Hook (Chair), Judy Crocker, Bettina McGimsey, Francine Stieglitz <br />Liaisons: Elaine Celi (LPS Transportation), Marc Valenti (DPW), John Livesy <br />(Engineering), Richard Canale (Planning Board) <br />Guests: Jill Hai, Jane Williamson, Susan Dedham, Jackie Pottersdam <br />1. The February meeting minutes were approved. <br />2. Adams St sidewalk discussion <br />Mr. Livsey reported that Adams St will be resurfaced from East St to the Woburn <br />line this summer. Engineering tries to evaluate adjoining sidewalks with any road <br />project, especially for pinch points where plows has access difficulty as well as <br />crosswalk ramps. The Lexington standard for sidewalk width is 50" (ADA requires <br />36" but snow equipment requires 48" width). The project includes replacing some <br />sections of sidewalk only and placing rumble strips on ramps. Overall sidewalk <br />replacement is not a part of this road project as approved by Town Meeting. <br />Adam St has known pinch points between the street guardrail and telephone poles. <br />Options for improving pedestrian access to the area include: <br />a) Evaluate removal of the guardrail. If it is not warranted by present town <br />code, then it can be removed. <br />b) Perform Research for alternative guardrail designs that may not be as wide. <br />c) Narrow the roadway so that the sidewalk can be widened. This scenario <br />would make the tight road even tighter in width. It is already a difficult road <br />to share with bikers due to its width. This is the last option. <br />Mr. Van Hook remarked that parts of the sidewalk are in bad shape and is <br />disappointed that the project does not include its replacement. He stated that it is a <br />busy, difficult road and that removing the guardrail might decrease pedestrian <br />safety. Mr. Livsey replied that it is not typical to install guardrails for the purpose of <br />pedestrian safety and that perhaps only sections of the rail could be removed in <br />order to solve the pinch point problem. <br />Unfortunately, the two problem telephone poles can take years to remove by NStar. <br />The Town tries to avoid such matters if at all possible. <br />Susan Dedham spoke on behalf of the neighborhood and endorsed keeping the <br />guardrail as a visual barrier for pedestrians and cars. Jackie Pottersdam wants to <br />keep the guardrail for safety's sake. Mr. Van Hook inquired if residents could instead <br />use the local bikepath as a safer alternative but Ms. Pottersdam reported that there <br />are too many obstructions for pedestrians here, including overgrown brush, litter, <br />and that there is crime in the area. <br />