|
Lexington Home Page
|
Help
|
About
|
Browse
Search
2011-09-26-TAR-min
Breadcrumb Navigation:
TownOfLexington-Public
>
WEB PUBLISHED-PUBLIC DOCUMENTS
>
MINUTES-REPORTS-COMMITTEES ARCHIVE
>
DISSOLVED COMMITTEES
>
Trash and Recycling Collection Task Force-TAR
>
Minutes
>
2011
>
2011-09-26-TAR-min
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/10/2012 10:52:25 AM
Creation date
7/10/2012 10:50:52 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Trash and Recycling Collection Task Force <br />Recommendations to Selectmen <br />September 26, 2011 <br />The Trash and Recycling Task Force met six times during the summer and September. These meetings <br />included visiting two recycling facilities, observing automated street side collection and talking in depth <br />with three vendors <br />The charter of the Task Force specifies input on 6 policy issues. Task Force members are unanimous in <br />supporting the following recommendations which we feel will provide enhanced service and value to <br />residents while increasing the Town's overall recycling rate. <br />1) Single stream recycling collection <br />We see little value in adopting a co- mingled, i.e. single stream recycling program. Only <br />communities with low recycling rates seem to benefit from single source collection. We <br />have reasonable compliance and a high recycling rate. Single stream collection would <br />only decrease the value of the product we collect. <br />2) Multi -town regional collection bid <br />No harm in trying, providing our RFP includes all the services and programs we specify <br />3) Automated refuse and recycling collection systems using totes. <br />We see no benefit to the residents, particularly if we continue with dual stream <br />recycling. Placing recycling in closed containers may lead to poorer accountability. <br />Storing and moving totes may be problematic for some residents <br />4) Additional curbside yard waste pick -ups and other services <br />a) Increasing the number of pick -ups to include two/ month April to September would <br />be highly desirable and should be included in the RFP. <br />b) In addition to increased curbside yard waste pick -ups the Task Force recommends <br />and <br />Curbside recycling of rigid plastic objects i.e. 5 gallon containers, certain toys <br />Removing carpet from the trash stream by requesting that carpet be designated <br />for recycling and the hauler accommodate special pick -ups of carpet in the same <br />manner that white goods are managed. <br />5) Enhanced waste ban and mandatory recycling <br />We recommend enforcement of mandatory recycling. The details of which should be <br />worked out with input from the selected hauler. Enforcement of mandatory recycling <br />should be accompanied by an education program and preceded by a grace period to <br />provide time for residents to adapt to new procedures. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.