Laserfiche WebLink
Report of the Transportation Ad Hoc Study Committee (DRAFT) <br />The Ad Hoc Study Committee was tasked to <br />• Review and make recommendations to the BOS for a new committee(s) structure to streamline <br />the oversight of transportation and safety related policies <br />• Specifically identify redundancies and overlap of responsibilities and recommend an improved <br />organizational oversight model. <br />Members represented the following boards and committees <br />Selectmen: Hank Manz and Norman Cohen <br />Planning Board: Michelle Ciccolo and Richard Canale <br />Transportation Advisory Committee: Bill Levison, alternate Sara Arnold <br />Traffic Safety Advisory Committee: Dave Cannon <br />Bicycle Advisory Committee: Peggy Enders <br />Sidewalk Advisory Committee: Jerry Van Hook <br />At Large: Jeanne Krieger, Chair <br />Staff: Linda Vine and Maryann McCall - Taylor <br />Background and Problem Statement <br />Transportation issues are difficult and contentious. Everybody experiences traffic and thus <br />everyone believes they are an expert. Our traffic problems can not all be solved locally. We endure the <br />impacts of overcapacity highways, cut - through commuter traffic and inadequate public transportation. <br />Neither Lexington nor the State invests adequately in solutions. Lexington has failed to keep pace with <br />increasing automobile traffic. <br />It is a time honored Lexington tradition to form a committee when confronted with a thorny <br />issue. There are at least 17 committees involved in addressing transportation and safety issues <br />(Appendix i). Some of these Committees have been existence for 30 years; most for nearly a decade and <br />one was launched during the tenure of the ad hoc Study Committee. The charges of the Committees <br />have not changed during this period, but there have been important changes in the Town's capacity to <br />deal with traffic related issues. <br />• New staff alignment- cf Transportation Program Recommendations, September 6, 2011 <br />(Appendix ii) <br />• Enhanced staff expertise, relieving committees of day -to day operations involvement, <br />• Increased awareness of traffic issues due to the advocacy of the many committees, but <br />nonetheless <br />