|
Lexington Home Page
|
Help
|
About
|
Browse
Search
2012-03-29-PBC-min
Breadcrumb Navigation:
TownOfLexington-Public
>
WEB PUBLISHED-PUBLIC DOCUMENTS
>
MINUTES-REPORTS-COMMITTEES ARCHIVE
>
Permanent Building Committee-PBC
>
Minutes
>
2010-2019
>
2012
>
2012-03-29-PBC-min
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/1/2019 1:59:11 PM
Creation date
5/24/2012 12:02:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Archives
Keywords or Subject
Minutes - PBC - Permanent Building Committee
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Lexington Permanent Building Committee <br />29 March 2012 <br />Gymnasium not to increase in size; shall remain as designed. <br />• Height of building not yet calculated <br />1/19/12 presentation /update <br />Detailed site plan with contours — "balanced site" presented in 3d model <br />Finalized plans with SF Not complete yet, still working on SF reduction <br />Space summary with net to gross ratio (limit 1.5) Not complete yet, still working on SF reduction <br />Estimates with breakouts To be presented at 1/26 meeting <br />Building System narratives copy circulated, was previously reviewed with DPF <br />Preliminary Energy Analysis To be presented at 1/26 meeting <br />LEED scorecard Copy circulated and discussed. <br />1/26/12 <br />• Reviewed updated floor plans sf down to 91,840. Building height discussed and estimates 43' at high point; average <br />height will be less but not calculated. Screen top +/- 51 -53'. Through course of DD we can cut but we cannot reduce <br />greatly without effecting program, we should include what we need now. <br />• Materials discussion next meeting. <br />0 Gymnasium floor to be designed as a floating floor with a layer of insulation in the middle to prevent noise transmission <br />through the floor. <br />• The Gymnasium floor was discussed as being wood or a type of linoleum. The Linoleum type product has better <br />maintenance and longevity characteristics. The school department prefers the linoleum type product, PBC agreed. <br />• Brief discussion regarding site plan and new and existing utilities. PBC would like to know if any of the utilities can come <br />from Robinson road and reduce long runs from Grove Street. <br />• Two Motions were made in support of the Special Education Submission and the Schematic Design Submission to the <br />MSBA <br />Motion: To recognize and approve the Lexington School Departments January 18, 2012 submittal to the Massachusetts <br />Department of Elementary and Secondary Education for Special Education Programming and MSBA space summary template for <br />the new Estabrook Elementary School Project. <br />Motion: Joe McWeeney 2" d : Dick Perry Vote: 6 -0 <br />Affirmative: 6 Jon Himmel, Carl Oldenburg, Chuck Favazzo, Joe McWeeney, Dick Perry, Eric Brown <br />Negative: 0 <br />Abstained: 0 <br />Not Present: 2 Peter Johnson, Philip Coleman <br />Motion: To accept and support DiNisco Design Partnership letter of 26 January 2012 recommending approval of schematic design <br />submittal package inclusive of space summary template and Schematic Design floor plans for the Estabrook School project with an <br />estimated construction cost not to exceed $31,200,000 and estimated project cost not to exceed $40.8 million, with school <br />occupancy in September 2014; subject to compliance with Lexington Zoning Code and applicable laws. <br />Motion: Dick Perry 2nd: Jon Himmel Vote: 6 -0 <br />Affirmative: 6 Jon Himmel, Carl Oldenburg, Chuck Favazzo, Joe McWeeney, Dick Perry, Eric Brown <br />Negative: 0 <br />Abstained: 0 <br />Not Present: 2 Peter Johnson, Philip Coleman <br />7.15 LEED <br />12/1/11 <br />Brief discussion on LEED design. DDP expressed that MSBA reimburses 2% for LEED Silver certification the first pass thru the LEED <br />scorecard should occur in the schematic design phase. <br />1/5/12 <br />Draft of LEED scorecard will be at next meeting <br />1/19/12 <br />Draft of LEED scorecard, tentatively showing 34 points presumed yes, 33, presumed maybe and 39 presumed no. Although this <br />will continue to be developed thru design it is presumed that LEED Silver is achievable. <br />LEED Scorecard will be reviewed with Facilities after 2/2/12. <br />Page 6of9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.