Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Addelson, Assistant Town Manager for Finance, was asked to present <br />possible financing options for the potential $2.95M acquisition. He explained <br />that the CPA would have approximately $1.87M in the CPF for FY 14, and <br />described four funding scenarios for paying down the debt service. He said <br />one approach would be to select a scenario which took advantage of the 10% <br />that is required to be aside each year for open space purposes — roughly <br />$440,000 in FY14. He showed bonding scenarios of 3-20 years, noting where <br />the "break even" points were, (where the 10% open space set-aside could be <br />used to satisfy the debt service.) Ms. Stolz of the Capital Expenditures <br />Committee stated that her Committee had discussed 5 years as a preliminary <br />bonding term, though they had not yet taken a vote on the matter. Mr. Cohen <br />noted that the percentage rate at the time of bonding could be more favorable <br />than the 4% that Mr. Addelson had used in his analysis. Mr. Bartenstein asked <br />when final debt payments would be made for Busa and Cotton Farm; Mr. <br />Addelson replied that final payments would be made on both projects in <br />FY13. <br />Mr. Burnell was asked about his minority opinion in the Selectmen's vote to <br />acquire the Wright Farm for conservation purposes. He said his objection was <br />due to his desire to see active agricultural use, "grazing or farming". He said <br />he did not want to see the land lie fallow. Mr. Hamilton responded to this <br />concern, stating that the Conservation Commission leases its land for <br />agricultural use, both for pasture land and for farming. Ms. Manz asked if the <br />Wright Farm was being considered for a community farm, to which Mr. <br />Hamilton responded that it was not. <br />Ms. Manz then directed the discussion to the application process and whether <br />the CPC was prepared to vote on the application as submitted. Some members <br />expressed concern with the process, stating that it felt "rushed" and ill-timed, <br />giving them little opportunity to review the two new updated appraisals and <br />the Draft Letter of Intent that had been submitted during the meeting. Mr. <br />Adler expressed his concern with the process and stated that he would not <br />vote on the application if given insufficient time to review the 16 pages of <br />material that had been submitted. Ms. Weiss noted that the information <br />session would not be held until April 24th, and suggested the CPC wait until <br />after the hearing to vote. Ms. Shaw expressed her difficulty with the process, <br />and said there had been too little time to review the important information <br />before the Committee. Ms. Krieger stated that she was prepared to vote. Ms. <br />Manz noted that it had been very difficult to get all members together for the <br />present meeting, and questioned whether another meeting of the full <br />Committee could be held before the CPC report needed to go to print. She <br />polled members individually as to their preferences. With a majority stating <br />that they were prepared to vote, Ms. Manz called for a motion to vote on the <br />acquisition at the present meeting. This vote was (6-3) in favor of voting <br />immediately rather than postponing the vote to another meeting. <br />0 <br />