Laserfiche WebLink
PBC Meeting Minutes <br />08 December 2011 Meeting <br />For the purposes of reducing ongoing printed text, previous entries under this heading may have been removed from current <br />meeting minutes. Please refer to previous editions of the minutes for older insertions. <br />10/13/11 <br />Construction Documents are scheduled for completion on 11/3/11. <br />Lexington will need up to date copies for MEP document review. <br />Contractor prequalification deadlines need to be scheduled into project. <br />11/2/11 <br />Final Documents due 11/3 <br />Drawings to go to MEP review <br />Variance request to be sent to Plumbing Board for unisex toilet in kitchen <br />Pre - Qualification of Contractors due 11/22 <br />12/8/11 <br />The Plumbing Board Variances were mailed out. <br />Contractor pre - qualification was discussed at a mtg. on 12/7/11 and a list of pre - qualified firms has been established. <br />Plans and specs are released to bid on 1/3/12. <br />4.21 Review of Design Development Estimate <br />For the purposes of reducing ongoing printed text, previous entries under this heading may have been removed from current <br />meeting minutes. Please refer to previous editions of the minutes for older insertions. <br />9/15/11 <br />PBC proposed changing contingency figure to 10% now. <br />Motion: Peter Johnson 2 Phillip Coleman Unanimous <br />10/13/11 <br />DPC presented an 80% CD estimate draft that puts total project cost at $22,875,027, however there are several hundred <br />thousand dollars reportedly to come out based upon their review to a corrected figure within a week or so. <br />PBC requested full estimate complete by 10/19 for PBC mtg. on 10/20 with a reconciliation of cost changes from 19.4 to 22.8 <br />General discussion followed on estimate points and what information is needed to justify cost increases. No formalized <br />conclusions. <br />10/20/11 <br />Goal of this meeting was to review changes in cost estimate. <br />DPC presented an updated 80% cost estimate totaling $22,638,958. <br />DPC presented a Table showing the primary components of the estimate (items A thru H.) as it progressed from SD 19.4 million <br />to 80% CD $22.6 Million. <br />There was discussion on some specific cost changes along with general discussion on trades and allowances. <br />Clerk Cost increased $150,000 due to double shift work. Sprinklers went up 20% in last 2 months. <br />DPC stated that the Estimator carried @ $5.50 sf vs. the Engineer originally @ $4.40 sf for sprinkler work. Question asked " Was <br />the productivity rate adjusted "? DPC did not know. <br />PBC would like to see more detail on the estimate and what increased the cost. Board would like a spread sheet that shows the <br />16 CSI divisions from SD to CD. <br />"How did estimator include cost of phasing into overall cost "? DPC did not know. <br />PBC will review data when received and advise if they want to have another meeting on this issue and whether or not estimator <br />should come. <br />10/27/11 <br />The Architects had forwarded a reconciliation of some of the cost changes from the DD — CD estimate but this did not reflect <br />cause for changes from SD -DD. By one members evaluation the main trades involved were the MEP trades with a cost change of <br />approx. 1.7 million from SD to CD and that the basis of the estimate at the SD phase may be the culprit for the increases. <br />12/8/11 <br />It was discussed that a letter had been received from the engineers outlining a basis for some of the cost changes as discussed <br />above, for use by the town. <br />4.24 Noise <br />8/23/11 <br />It was discussed if the noise ordinance would prohibit double shift work. DPF reported that we have had double shift work at other <br />buildings without complaint. Further the building commissioner has stated there is not a problem when the work is inside the <br />building. Further the fire department has confirmed that it has no impact on their regulations. <br />9/8/11 <br />DPC felt that town ordinance was involved with regulating construction noise and that the project may need dispensation from BOS <br />for hours of operation. DPF will follow up. <br />Page 4 of 8 <br />