Laserfiche WebLink
• Increased awareness of traffic issues due to the advocacy of the many committees, resulting in <br />increased public demand for more alternatives, such as bike and pedestrian accommodations, <br />as well as improved transit. Nonetheless there is <br />• Ever increasing congestion on Lexington streets. <br />The Transportation Element of the Lexington's Comprehensive Plan ' offers a policy on <br />transportation for the Town. Despite the existence of this Plan, it is not clear how decisions are made or <br />by whom. The committees tend to be advocates for a portion of transportation and are often left to <br />operate on their own with little apparent input given, or sought, from the Board of Selectmen or the <br />Planning Board. In general, it is unclear how decisions are made and by whom, what the guidelines are <br />for making decisions, and what committee has jurisdiction over what. Communication and coordination <br />among the committees is lacking with the exception of information provided by liaisons who are <br />affiliated with one or more committees. The State administered federal transportation funding process, <br />the Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) process, is not well understood and the Town may be <br />missing opportunities or moving projects along at a slower pace than could be realized with greater <br />attention. <br />All of these factors underscore the necessity of streamlining our approach to traffic issues to <br />ensure that resources are deployed effectively and focused on commonly accepted objectives. <br />Resources and Tools <br />Staff Involvement and the Role of Liaisons <br />Of the ten committee memberships analyzed (Appendix iii), 20 of the 91 members are liaisons; <br />six are staff. Several liaisons are affiliated with more than one committee. The significance of these <br />observations is open to interpretation when one considers that this ad hoc committee of 12 has two <br />assigned staff. <br />Committee members value their liaisons and staff, who keep them informed and advise how to <br />get things done. Regular attendance by liaisons and staff is preferred over sporadic attendance. <br />Transportation Committees, simply due to their number, are demanding of staff and liaisons. Those <br />serving as liaisons are constrained by time limitations and cannot attend all meetings. They view <br />themselves as committee resources, rather than participants. A more comprehensive review of liaison <br />roles is being conducted by Selectmen Deb Mauger. <br />The Transportation Element of the Comprehensive Plan 1, <br />The Comprehensive Plan, adopted by the Planning Board in 2003, was forward thinking and <br />includes items yet to be done. It should be consulted. The values espoused in the Plan are as valid now <br />as they were nearly a decade ago. This is a document that can provide direction to both committees and <br />staff and assure focus on commonly accepted objectives. <br />