Laserfiche WebLink
Transportation Advisory Committee <br />Date: June 21, 2010 <br />Members Present: Sara Arnold, Sally Castleman, Elaine Dratch, Bill Levison, Peter Levy, <br />Francine Stieglitz. <br />Members Absent: Larry Link, Danny Moraff <br />Liaisons: Nancy Adler- COA and Richard Canale- Planning Board <br />Staff: Gail Wagner <br />Minutes from TAC Meeting of May 20, 2010 approved. <br />Senior Transportation Forum 6/8/10 <br />➢ A panel of speakers representing TAC, FISH, MBTA- the RIDE, and Lexpress spoke to <br />an audience of approximately 50. Audience questions covered diverse topics such as <br />bike racks on Lexpress, MBTA and Lexpress route questions, RIDE application <br />procedures, more transit schedules available at COA, extending services in evenings and <br />weekends, and guidance for seniors when to stop driving. <br />➢ Briana Olson of the Town Manger's Office is still collecting surveys and will compile <br />responses. TAC members were encouraged to take the survey available online. <br />➢ Nancy Adler explained that this was the first in a series of COA transportation <br />discussions. She was pleased to see the audience was broader than the customary COA <br />core participants. <br />MA Revised Open Meeting Law <br />➢ Purpose is to make public meetings open to the public. It is scheduled to take effect <br />July 1, but a more realistic date is November 1. There are many aspects that require <br />clarification. <br />➢ Highlights: Committee quorum cannot deliberate outside of posted public meetings. This <br />prohibits committee email exchanges on matters of discussion. If a report is distributed, <br />comments are to be held until a posted meeting is conducted. Sub committees are held to <br />the same standard. Upon informing a convened committee, a member of the public can <br />tape/ video any posted meeting. All persons are to be recognized by the chair prior to <br />speaking. <br />➢ Penalties for violating the Open Meeting Law range from added training for an honest <br />mistake to a $1,000 fine levied against the Town for a blatant mistake. <br />Hartwell Ave TMOD <br />➢ The consultants' plan emphasize road infrastructure, such as center median on Bedford <br />Street to limit left turns and roundabouts to promote directional traffic flow. Public <br />concerns as to pedestrian, bike safety and public transit have not received adequate <br />answers to date. <br />➢ The design phase is estimated to cost the town $1.4 million, but the traffic mitigation fees <br />will be based on a cost of $2.1 million to allow for contingencies. State and federal funds <br />to pay for construction. <br />➢ Hartwell Ave current occupancy level is less than 50 %. <br />➢ TDM proposal is for developer to may $20 per worker per year to fund a new TMA. <br />This fee can be reduced to as little as $10 per worker if the peak hour trip generation rate <br />falls below 1.0 trip per thousand square feet of occupied floor area. <br />➢ TDM proposal raised the following concerns: no detailed plan to reduce SOV usage; <br />adequacy of TMA funding; monitoring of SOV reduction measures; $20 or less per <br />annual payment per worker not seen as a significant incentive for SOV reductions; <br />➢ Specificity as found with infrastructure plans is lacking in the TDM aspects. <br />