Laserfiche WebLink
Since Lexington’s adoption of the Community Preservation Act in 2006, the CPC has <br />recommended and Town Meeting has approved the funding of $23,300,147 for CPA projects. <br />These funds have supported 42 historic preservation projects, preserved 52.4 acres of open space, <br />created or preserved 8 recreational facilities, and created or supported 172 units of affordable <br />$6,403,189, or 27%, has been received from the State as matching <br />housing. Of this total, <br />funds. <br />Our CPA expenditures are funded by a voluntary surcharge on property taxes together with <br />matching funds from the State. Lexington adopted the CPA with the full 3% surcharge on both <br />residential and commercial taxpayers. Mindful of the burden on homeowners, however, the <br />Town also adopted provisions which exempt the first $100,000 of home value from the <br />surcharge, as well as granting a total exemption from the surcharge to lower income residents. In <br />2010, the annual surcharge averaged $245 per Lexington household. Our commercial taxpayers <br />contributed $639,153 last year, representing one-fifth of our CPA surcharge revenue. The State <br />match, originally, 100%, has declined since 2006 as additional communities have adopted the <br />statute and joined the funding pool, and as registry fees which feed the State fund have suffered <br />in a weak economy. However, the match is currently estimated at 25%, still a healthy return on <br />investment. <br />Through its membership in the statewide non-profit Community Preservation Coalition, the CPC <br />supportsAn Act to Sustain Community Preservation, which is now before the State legislature. <br />The proposed law makes a number of improvements to the CPA, including expanding the <br />definition of eligible projects and allowing communities to opt in to the statute by using existing <br />municipal funding sources rather than imposing the property tax surcharge. Most importantly, <br />the bill proposes to fix the State match of municipal funds at no less than 75% by adjusting real <br />estate recording fees. The bill has the support of 114 legislators, a majority of both houses, and <br />appears to have a good chance of passage this year. <br />CPC Position on Article 17 <br />Article 17 before the 2011 Town Meeting proposes reducing our voluntary surcharge from 3% to <br />1%, (as permitted in the statute), to ease the burden on Lexington’s taxpayers. Unlike normal <br />property taxes, however, the CPA surcharge brings a substantial State subsidy that would <br />otherwise be unavailable to Lexington. For a very small addition to our annual property taxes <br />($245 on average in 2010) taxpayers leverage hundreds of thousands of dollars in matching <br />funds, $858,729 last year alone. Had Lexington opted for only a 1% surcharge in 2006, the loss <br />to us in State funds over the past five years would have been more than $4.2 million dollars. <br />In 2006, both of the Town’s finance committees opposed adoption of the CPA, in part because of <br />concern that paying the surcharge would discourage voters from supporting necessary overrides <br />or debt exclusions. This has not happened. Town Meeting has passed three overrides for <br />school/municipal funding and a debt exclusion for construction of our public services building <br />since the CPA was adopted. The finance committees give careful review to all projects proposed <br />for CPA funding, and have supported all but a handful of the projects recommended by the CPC. <br />Based on five years of experience with the CPA, both the Capital Expenditures Committee and <br />the Appropriation Committee now oppose Article 17. <br />2 <br /> <br />