2007-05-22-CONCOM-min - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

MINUTES — LEXINGTON CONSERVATION COMMISSION May 22, 2007 that does not meet required performance standard setbacks. Mr. Bitsko stated that this project is not a wetland replication project, and involves removing current phragmites plant with root stock, replacing upper soil horizon, and replanting with noninvasive species to create a more diverse habitat. The issue is whether it will take and whether the homeowner is willing to ensure survivability for the next ten years. Mr. Smyers suggested that the commission have a condition of the Order be to require monitoring of the wetlands restoration area and enforce compliance instead of requiring posting of a bond. Mr. Wolk asked how this project, specifically stormwater management, is an improvement over existing condition because it appears that this is status quo. Mr. Smyers responds by saying that the amount of infiltration being proposed is beyond what is required on that 25 cf of the existing driveway will managed under the hundred year storm event. Mr. Smyers went on to state that the key part of this project is improving the function of the wetland, providing diversity, and improving wildlife habitat functions. Mr. Wolk replied that he is having a difficult time understanding the long term benefit of the replanting of a functioning wetland. No one has assured the commission that the phragmites will be completely removed, and thus, what is the benefit if they come back in ten years. Motion made and seconded to close the hearing, 7 -0 in favor. 9:17 p.m. Commission voted by roll call vote to go into executive session for the purpose of discussing land acquisition and agreed not reopen meeting to the public. 9:45 p.m. Meeting adjourned. Respectfully submitted by, Louise Vinci Department Clerk Page 4 of 4