|
Lexington Home Page
|
Help
|
About
|
Browse
Search
2010-11-16-LEARY-min
Breadcrumb Navigation:
TownOfLexington-Public
>
WEB PUBLISHED-PUBLIC DOCUMENTS
>
MINUTES-REPORTS-COMMITTEES ARCHIVE
>
DISSOLVED COMMITTEES
>
Ad hoc Leary Property Community Housing Task Force-LEARY
>
Minutes
>
2010
>
2010-11-16-LEARY-min
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/16/2011 1:37:23 PM
Creation date
2/16/2011 1:37:23 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
and stabilization failed for lack of a second. Minimal stabilizing attempts were <br />proposed. The Salemi report listed many problems. In the end as little as 15 % of the <br />structure would be saved, this to his mind would make it a replica, not preservation. <br />The money would not be available until the spring so it wouldn’t help get the house <br />through the winter. The amount of money did not enter into his decision, but rather that <br />it could not be historic preservation given how little of the original structure would <br />remain. <br />Betsey Weiss said that the Ad Hoc Leary Committee had received a letter from Americo <br />Andrade whose firm rehabs existing buildings into affordable housing in Cambridge <br />and works with CASCAP that builds affordable housing in Cambridge dated Oct. 1. <br />st <br />She then quoted from the letter “The cost of the work to rehabilitate the farm house <br />would be in line with any new construction budgets and as such would not impinge or <br />burden it in overall cost tabulations while at the same time exemplify a respect for the <br />past and offer the hope for similar dwellings in the Lexington community could follow <br />along the same paths when expansion needs are considered.” She then added that Ross <br />Spear, an architect who rehabs buildings, had attended some of the Ad Hoc Leary <br />meetings. <br />Mr. Kinneen said that what mattered was “that meadow with that house.” The <br />neighbors don’t know what’s inside and don’t care, so gutting the interior would be fine, <br />just save the gorgeous house. <br />Ross Speer said that the Task Force has looked at a lot of ideas. He had done a general <br />walk around and felt it as a fairly solid house. However if the interior plan is kept as is, <br />it would be strange for the proposed use. <br />Arlene Belliveau, 67 Vine St. – Look at the house in front of St. Brigid’s for a contrast in <br />process. Even if it ends up being a replica, she would want that. She remembers the <br />barn and a cow or two on the site. The street can’t handle additional dwellings. The <br />traffic should be studied first before any decisions are made about the number of <br />dwellings. <br />Mr. Hemond said that only 15% salvageable sounded way too low. There seems to be a <br />mind set that the house has to go. Perhaps it doesn’t need to be brought up to code. <br />Anne Engelhart, 107 Vine – She loves the fact that the house can be seen on 19 century <br />th <br />maps. She realizes that it is difficult to make it useable and maybe an evocation of the <br />farmhouse could be a compromise. <br />Mr. Kinneen said that it is the last house of its type in Lexington. It is worth the extra <br />money to save it. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.