Laserfiche WebLink
October 27, 2010 <br />• Third, to state their position that the school building should be replaced with a <br />new building in the near term. <br />Dr. Ash and DPF Director Goddard will be submitting on November 5 an emergency <br />statement of interest (SOI) to the State regarding assistance in paying for a new building, <br />and expect to receive a response four to six weeks later. If the State approves the request, <br />there will be a limited time -frame for the Town to appropriate funds for planning and <br />design work. If the emergency SOI is not accepted, the Town may then submit a non - <br />emergency, i.e., a regular, SOI. If no SOI is accepted, the Town will need to consider <br />whether it wants to proceed without State assistance. If Question 3 passes on Nov. 2, the <br />State will not have the funds to provide assistance. The total cost of a new building is <br />estimated to be roughly $30M. The new Harrington School may serve as a model for a <br />new Estabrook School. <br />Based on recent test results, the DPF will implement a set of relatively simple <br />remediation actions throughout the building over the next two weeks using DPF and <br />contractor personnel. The test results indicate that there is a reasonable likelihood that <br />the work will bring PCB air concentrations down below EPA guideline thresholds. A <br />measurement of the PCB air concentration will then be conducted in every classroom. <br />Dr. Ash and Mr. Goddard reviewed current and future spending. To inform this review, <br />Mr. Goddard distributed a sheet summarizing the costs. $80K of the $250K transfer from <br />the Reserve Fund voted on October 13 was used to support remediation work after the <br />date of the A.C. transfer vote. The Town just learned that EH &E has billed (or intends to <br />bill) the Town an additional $179K for work beyond that covered by the $80K. This <br />work was not envisioned when EH &E was first engaged. This led to a discussion of <br />EH &E's qualifications, capabilities, and role. Members of the Committee urged the <br />Town to ask for itemization of the bill and to discuss this bill and billing practices with <br />EH &E, given that the work has extended far beyond early expectations. <br />The expenditures related to the PCB problem are expected to reach a total of about <br />$943K over the next few months. Since $400,000 has been covered by Reserve Fund <br />transfers, and $51,910 has been redirected from various capital article budgets, this leaves <br />a shortfall of approximately $491K. The shortfall has been covered by the DPF budget <br />($421,102) and the school system budget ($70,401). In addition, it is presently <br />anticipated that there will be a request of approximately $273K at the 2011 annual town <br />meeting for remediation work to be done next summer. This amount is not included in <br />the $943K figure. The cost summary presently includes $100K as contingency, but some <br />of this is now expected to cover the testing to be done prior to the annual town meeting. <br />The remainder will be the true contingency amount that will be available, for example, <br />for fixing any high levels of contamination found in the next testing round. In response <br />to a question, Mr. Goddard said that he would look into heating costs at Estabrook given <br />the recent changes in ventilation. There were unresolved questions about this spending <br />proposal; Dr. Ash and Mr. Goddard will review the details and offer a revised budget by <br />Wednesday, Nov. 3. <br />-2- <br />