Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />2.Discussion of the Selectmen’s Summit Meeting of September 13th <br />– Ms. <br />Manz asked the CPC for their reaction to the Selectmen’s CPA Summit <br />th <br />Meeting of September 13. Reactions were mixed regarding the value of the <br />meeting, with general agreement that it “cleared the air”. Ms. Manz felt that <br />there had been an acknowledgement of the CPC’s authority to select projects <br />for submission to Town Meeting and a willingness on the part of the finance <br />committees to give technical assistance. Mr. Adler voiced his concern that he <br />felt that the CPC was being criticized and even instructed. <br /> <br />There was a general discussion of the perception that the CPC did not receive <br />the same information as the finance committees and that requests for further <br />information had been problematic. Mr. Kanter assured the CPC that the <br />initial information that CEC members received on the various projects was <br />exactly the same as that given to the CPC. It was felt, however that the CPC <br />would be well served to have a representative at CEC meetings to foster <br />better communication. A motion was made and unanimously voted to have <br />Mr. Adler be the CPC representative to the CEC. Ms. Manz asked Mr. Parker <br />if a representative would be useful for communication between the AC and <br />the CPC. Mr. Parker responded that it would probably not be necessary, since <br />the AC doesn’t “vet” CPC projects. Ms. Rice suggested sending the AC (and <br />CEC) occasional updates during the CPC review process to improve <br />communication. Ms. Manz asked Ms. Rice to do so. <br /> <br />Ms. Manz also brought up the CPC’s Needs Assessment Report, and noted <br />that it had been some time since the CPC had specifically consulted the <br />Report. She noted that it had a complete set of Guidelines that the CPC had <br />developed for their review process. She also suggested that the Town’s 5- <br />year capital plan should be added to the source documents in the Report to <br />provide more context for CPC consideration of municipal projects. She said <br />that the Report should help the CEC and AC better understand the CPC’s <br />guidelines and procedures for project review. <br /> <br /> <br />3.CPA Budget and Upcoming Projects <br /> – Ms. Rice presented a preliminary <br />breakdown of the estimated revenue and anticipated projects to date. The <br />financial information on the chart was in draft form; final numbers will be <br />available when Town Finance Director, Rob Addelson presents the CPA <br />financial model at an upcoming meeting. Ms. Rice read through the list of <br />upcoming projects with known amounts, and noted projects for which there <br />were no known costs. The latter included projects such as the Fire Station, <br />Leary land planning costs and upcoming LexHAB projects. Members made <br />changes to the list of projects, which Ms. Rice will incorporate into the <br />spreadsheet. Mr. Kanter noted that the Community Preservation Fund's share <br />of the monies received by the Town as premium and accrued interest from <br />the February 25, 2010, sale of the bonds--which included funds for the Busa <br />land acquisition--had not been incorporated into the spreadsheet." This <br /> 2 <br /> <br />