Laserfiche WebLink
Selectmen or CPC could proceed with their respective votes with only a three- <br />page summary for the second appraisal. He also questioned whether the CPC <br />would have their required 14-day review period for review, a policy they had <br />adopted after the Busa acquisition. There were further questions about whether <br />the CPC could pay more than the appraised price for the property, to which Mr. <br />Kelley responded that Town Counsel had reviewed this issue, felt that both <br />appraisals should be scrutinized, but that as long as the appraisals were conducted <br />with acceptable standards, either one would stand. <br /> <br />Mr. Hornig, speaking as a resident, not as a Planning Board member, questioned <br />the prudence of accepting a purchase price in the $4 million dollar range. He cited <br />two properties at 341 Marrett Road and 52 Lowell Street which were purchased in <br />2008 and 2009 and had reasonable lot values. One he noted had sold for <br />$520,000/acre. With this in mind, he questioned the wisdom of buying the <br />Cataldo land at approximately $952,000/acre. Mr. Hornig further questioned the <br />“left lot” value of the land, stating that he felt Mr. Cataldo’s remaining lots would <br />be enhanced by the surrounding conservation land, and thereby increase in value. <br />He asked if this had been taken into account in establishing the value of the 4.2 <br />acres under negotiation. <br /> <br />There were supporters of the purchase, including Mr. Gerry Paul, an abutter. He <br />stated that he agreed there might be some “sticker shock” to the purchase price, <br />but that in the future, as with many land purchases, the Town would look back <br />and feel they got a bargain. He said he felt Town Meeting should ultimately <br />decide. <br /> <br />Mr. Bartenstein returned to the issue of the appraisals, and asked Mr. Kelley to <br />describe and explain the various appraisals which had been completed on the <br />Cataldo property over the past several years. Mr. Kelley reviewed a number of the <br />past appraisals, but explained that they were not a comparison of apples to apples, <br />since many of the past appraisals included different land configurations than in <br />the present two appraisals. Mr. Urich stressed the need for the second appraisal to <br />be made available to Town Boards and TMM members as soon as possible. <br /> <br />Residents in support of the acquisition included Mr. David Kaufman, who spoke <br />of the wildlife value of the parcel, and Mr. David Williams, who noted the <br />contiguous nature of the parcel, its value to school children, and the aesthetic <br />value it had to passersby. Ms. Ann Cubic noted that the land was one of the older <br />parcels in Town with an agricultural history and that it also had value as a <br />connecting swath of open space. <br /> <br />There were questions about the roadway on the property which will be used by <br />the Cataldo family until the family further develops the existing home (or <br />removes it) or develops the back lots. Mr. Kanter asked if the agreement with the <br />Cataldos gave the Conservation Commission the right to install a parkinglot while <br /> 2 <br /> <br />