Laserfiche WebLink
said the need for the project “would not disappear”, that the Town Office <br />Building should be welcoming to residents and visitors, and urged the CPC to <br />fund it in its entirety. <br /> <br />Ms. Buckley then answered a number of questions from CPC members. These <br />included the need for handicapped access at the lower westerly entrance, the <br />height of light switches and the need for their replacement, lighting issues, and <br />bathrooms on the lower level. <br /> <br />Ms. Weiss asked if the TOB was considered a top priority by the Commission <br />to which Ms. Buckley said that it was. Mr. Kanter asked to see a list of the <br />priorities for municipal buildings, and Ms. Buckley said she would provide it. <br /> <br />There was general agreement among CPC members regarding the need for the <br />project, but there were questions about the appropriateness of completing the <br />project with CPA funds. Ms. Fenollosa noted that project might not receive <br />support on the floor of Town Meeting. There were disparate views on the CPC <br />regarding the funding of the project, with Ms. Krieger noting that it was her <br />belief that CPA funds were very appropriate for the purpose of ADA upgrades <br />and for the project as a whole. <br /> <br />Mr. Adler noted that there were residents who felt that funding the TOB with <br />CPA funds would be a “dramatic mistake”. He said he felt the Fire Station <br />renovation represented a higher priority. A lengthy discussion ensued <br />regarding the different philosophies represented by different members of the <br />CPC. Mr. Adler went on to say that he had done a breakout of the costs he felt <br />were unnecessary, which included among many items, a Clerk of the Works <br />and ADA upgrades to the westerly lower entrance. With these costs taken out, <br />he proposed that $1,031,923 was a more fitting funding level for consideration. <br /> <br />Mr. Kanter stressed the importance of not “backing in” to the dollar amount <br />and stated his opinion that the project should be evaluated in its entirety. There <br />were questions about specific parts of the project, however, which Mr. Barrett <br />addressed. He explained that the cost of the handicapped bathrooms had been <br />factored into the estimate for the project, and that the unused $49,000 from the <br />FY09 Town Office Building ADA Bathroom and Signage project would be <br />turned back to the CPA fund. He also explained that a Clerk of the Works was <br />necessary for the project, and that an existing Town employee could not fill the <br />position. He stressed that supervising contractors, dealing with parking and <br />egress and access issues, etc. was a full time job and was too time-consuming <br />for existing staff. <br /> <br />Ms. Krieger moved that the CPC allocate $1,825,821 for the project, the entire <br />amount requested by the applicant, with the understanding that the $49,000 <br />from the FY09 ADA Bathroom renovation project be returned to the CPA <br /> 2 <br /> <br />