|
Lexington Home Page
|
Help
|
About
|
Browse
Search
2010-08-25-LEARY-min
Breadcrumb Navigation:
TownOfLexington-Public
>
WEB PUBLISHED-PUBLIC DOCUMENTS
>
MINUTES-REPORTS-COMMITTEES ARCHIVE
>
DISSOLVED COMMITTEES
>
Ad hoc Leary Property Community Housing Task Force-LEARY
>
Minutes
>
2010
>
2010-08-25-LEARY-min
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/21/2022 4:11:35 PM
Creation date
11/5/2010 11:37:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Archives
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Meeting Notes <br />Ad hoc Leary Property Community Housing Task Force <br />August 25, 2010 2:00 p.m. <br />Room 207, Town Office Building <br /> <br />Present: Bob Bicknell, George Burnell, MarilynFenollosa, Aaron Henry, Wendy <br /> <br />Manz, Maryann McCall-Taylor, Lester Savage and Betsey Weiss <br />Absent: Bill Hays, Stephen Keane and Deb Mauger <br /> <br /> <br />Housekeeping <br />Lex Savage to serve as interim chair <br /> <br /> <br />Reminder to read Conflict of Interest Statute and complete on-line training <br /> <br /> <br />(http://db.state.ma.us/ethics/quiz_MEthics/index.asp) <br /> <br />Review of Committee Charge <br /> <br />Issues that will need to be addressed during the life of the task force <br />Treatment of existing house <br /> <br /> <br />Development scenarios <br /> <br /> <br />Funding <br /> <br /> <br />Public process <br /> <br /> <br />Timeline <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Discussion of House <br />Cost to rehab is up to $500,000 and both Community Preservation <br /> <br /> <br />Committee (CPC) and Town Meeting would have to approve. That is a very <br />high cost per square foot <br />The letter from Salemi was in response to questions from LexHAB. <br /> <br /> <br />Community Preservation Coalition was asked if the development could be <br /> <br /> <br />mixed income. They said probably not, as it has already been acquired with <br />specified funds. This opinion should be confirmed in a letter from the <br />Department of Revenue (DOR) <br />CPA funds allow affordability for up to 100% area median income (AMI) <br /> <br /> <br />Should money be expended to preserve this structure? What is the priority <br /> <br /> <br />for CPA funds for the next five years? The historic preservation money has <br />gone to projects such as Police, Fire and Town Office Buildings that would be <br />funded even if there weren’t CPA funds. If CPA is to fund things that the town <br />couldn’t ordinarily do, this would a priority. <br />Vine Street has lost most of its integrity but this lot is emblematic of the <br /> <br /> <br />farming culture that used to be in town. Would additional units interfere with <br />the integrity of the site? No <br />Historic status- Built prior to 1853, it is on the Cultural Inventory and subject <br /> <br /> <br />to the demolition delay bylaw. Have others like it been preserved? Need to <br />know if the town wants to spend money to save this. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.