Laserfiche WebLink
Breadcrumb Navigation:
Lw, no prob w /drivethru windowm <br />Most happy to see improvement in parking, landscaping <br />RH— walgreens wd be financially responsible <br />NB —move we support the ZEO, <br />MH —can be used as an accessory use type, <br />RS —don't want as precedent, <br />Their argument is is an accessory use, <br />Nb= uphold zeo decision, <br />But going to grant variance <br />One of conditions is to like to strongly recommend walgreens take a look at landscaping, <br />lighting, and parking, <br />RH —like opinion on increasing floor area, re little roof area <br />MH —my interpretarion is not increasing floor area because no walls <br />(Iput this in decision) <br />move to uphold zeo decision <br />5 -0, kunanimous <br />re Variance <br />so moved, w /conditions <br />5 -0, unanimously granted <br />rs, more read 40A, more confused <br />state saying wd be improper of commercial use, e.g. in residential zone, this def. Of use <br />variance <br />fs, apologize for not catching myself, <br />planning bd, right, <br />overcome by desire to improve parking lot <br />lw, see great deal of value in what proposing <br />rs, need to see better way to do it <br />as, concurs, pb correct <br />can't issue variance re use <br />rs, still problem <br />if they came to us to put door there, cd get by right ?yes <br />walk up, give prescrption, only at this door, that wd be permissible <br />but bec. Want driveup window instead of door, prob <br />now prob w/kids in car, <br />or leaving car running, <br />