|
Lexington Home Page
|
Help
|
About
|
Browse
Search
2010-05-10-AC-min
Breadcrumb Navigation:
TownOfLexington-Public
>
WEB PUBLISHED-PUBLIC DOCUMENTS
>
MINUTES-REPORTS-COMMITTEES ARCHIVE
>
Appropriation Committee-AC
>
Minutes
>
2010-2019
>
2010
>
2010-05-10-AC-min
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/2/2022 3:28:07 PM
Creation date
9/3/2010 12:58:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Archives
Year
2010
Keywords or Subject
Minutes - AC - Appropriation Committee
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
Page 1 of 1
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
May 10, 2010 <br />Minutes <br />Town of Lexington Appropriation Committee <br />May 10, 2010 <br />Place and time: Ellen Stone Room, Cary Memorial Building, 6:30 p.m. <br />Members present: Alan Levine (Chair), Glenn Parker (Vice - Chair), John Bartenstein <br />(Vice Chair and Secretary), Rick Eurich, Mollie Garberg, Susan McLeish, Eric <br />Michelson, Joe Pato <br />Also present: Micah Niemy (Budget Officer), Kay Tiffany, Ingrid Klimoff, Charles <br />Hornig, Margaret Rawls, David Williams, Joyce Miller, Dawn McKenna <br />The meeting preceded the tenth and final session of the annual town meeting. It was <br />called to order at 6:30 p.m. <br />1. Resolution on the Munroe School (Article 36). The committee briefly <br />discussed the latest version of Jim Wood's proposed resolution expressing Town <br />Meeting's desires concerning the process to be followed in disposing of the Munroe <br />School. The committee voted to support that resolution by a vote of 8 -0. <br />2. Cotton Farm Purchase (Article 9). The committee continued its discussion <br />of the pro's and con's of the proposed purchase of an approximately four -acre portion of <br />the Cotton Farm with CPA funds. Comments were made by a number of visitors <br />interested in the topic. Topics discussed included the appraisal process by which the <br />valuation was determined, particularly the absence of a "before and after" analysis taking <br />into account benefits to the retained parcel from placing the acquired portion into <br />conservation; alternative arrangements that might be made to achieve some of the scenic, <br />conservation and preservation goals at a lower cost; and the likely disposition of this <br />property if the pending article is not adopted. At the conclusion of the discussion, the <br />committee remained split 4 -4 on this article. It was agreed that Al Levine would present <br />to the Town Meeting the views of those in support of the article, and that Joe Pato would <br />present the views of those opposed. <br />The meeting was adjourned at 7:20 p.m. <br />Respectfully submitted, <br />John Bartenstein <br />Approved August 26, 2010 <br />-1- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.