Laserfiche WebLink
APPROPRIATION COMMITTEE 3' REPORT, April 23, 2007, TO 2007 ATM <br />vehicle storage and operations area would reduce the total capital and operating life -cycle costs to the <br />Town as opposed to an outdoor vehicle storage by about $1 IM (net present value). We note that while <br />many aspects of their analysis could be debated because the effects considered are difficult to quantify <br />definitively, the conclusion so strongly favors the indoor, minimally heated, storage- and - operations <br />alternative that it would not change even if some of the advantages were eliminated from the accounting. <br />In early February, the Board of Selectmen asked this Committee and other stakeholders whether, based on <br />the work of the review team, they would support the continuation of work by the design team through the <br />50% completion of construction drawings for the Annual Town Meeting. This Committee voted <br />unanimously: <br />(1) To endorse the "review & confirm" process as responsive to the direction given by the 2006 Fall <br />STM2; <br />(2) To support the adjusted design as reasonable to the Town's needs for the DPW for the foreseeable <br />future (e.g., —50 years); and <br />(3) To endorse continuing to develop the construction documents based on the adjusted <br />programmatic design so that a more - detailed design, with more precise costing for both capital <br />and operating, would be ready prior to the 2007 Annual Town Meeting —with the expectation <br />that this Committee would provide its opinion on that further - defined project at that Town <br />Meeting. <br />This Committee noted that it was endorsing the overall programmatic plan, including, among all the other <br />aspects of the plan, the general size of the building, the decision to move the DPW senior administration <br />and the Engineering Department from the Town Offices Building and the Municipal Building <br />Maintenance Department from Cary Memorial Building to 201 Bedford Street, the inclusion of space in <br />the new facility for the Schools senior maintenance staff (which space would accommodate a joint <br />municipal /schools facilities - maintenance department), and the decision to include a minimally heated, <br />indoor, vehicle storage and operations area. <br />The Board of Selectmen and other committees also endorsed the recommendations resulting from the <br />review process. With those confirmations having been made, the Board of Selectmen gave the PBC the <br />go -ahead to proceed with the design to the point of 50% completion of construction documents. <br />The design process continued with attention to the heating, ventilating, and air conditioning (HVAC), <br />electrical, and plumbing systems; the projected costs of energy for those systems; and the plans for <br />operations during the construction. Much progress was also made on the exterior appearance—including <br />the important "public face" of the facility (the fapade seen from Bedford Street, from the Minuteman <br />Bikeway, and from the other adjoining properties). Issues on those matters have been addressed to our <br />satisfaction. <br />Upon achieving 50% completion of the construction documents, the design team sent them to a firm that <br />used them to develop a new cost estimate. The PBC and the design team presented the design and that <br />cost estimate to the Board of Selectmen on April 18, 2007. The estimated cost of the somewhat smaller <br />and slightly reconfigured facility is $27.47M —which is being rounded to $27.5M. (That includes the <br />$2.32M already appropriated and used for the design process.) <br />More detailed information on the design, project costs, projected energy costs, and key- design rationale <br />may be found at http://ci.lexington.ma.us/dpw/New%20Facility/DPW%20facility.ht <br />Conclusion <br />As one considers the wisdom of spending $27.5M on a new facility, we reiterate the points made in the <br />Preface of this review that every resident takes advantage of, and benefits from, services provided by the <br />DPW. Furthermore, it is the Town's responsibility to provide decent working conditions for its <br />employees. The condition of the present facilities has deteriorated to the point that it is incumbent upon us <br />to do something about them. <br />